2022-09-14 CC Packet - (Revised)

Home Browse Search

City of Centerville Council Meeting Minutes August 10, 2022 that and in the agreement, they were not to sell while the Main Street Market was going on. Administrator Statz read the clauses in the agreement. Mayor Love asked if this amendment was an after the fact. Administrator Statz said yes. Council Member Mosher stated that he was not sure what they were going sell and maybe we should invite them to be a part of our Main Street Market. Administrator Statz stated that this was during their show, after Main Street Market closed. Council Member Koski mentioned that there is a clause about insurance and liability that the City would not be liable. Administrator Statz stated that the agreement helps protect us. Motion by Council Member Mosher, seconded by Council Member King to Approve Consent Agenda Items #4 as Presented. All in favor. Motion carried. Item #5 Î Council Member King asked for clarifications on this. He asked if there ever was a policy previously. Administrator Statz stated that we had 2 to 3 similar requests and wanted to streamline this policy and treat everyone equally. Motion by Council Member King, seconded by Council Member Mosher to Approve Consent Agenda Items #5 as Presented. All in favor. Motion carried. VIII.OLD BUSINESS 1. Alternative Trail Design Î Old Mill Estates Administrator Statz stated some time ago Council discussed the possibility of moving a portion of the planned bituminous trail adjacent to 1844 Old Mill Court to a boardwalk that would run through the wetland and pull the trail away from the home to enhance privacy. After researching and pricing out the boardwalk option, it became clear that it would be cost-prohibitive. The homeowner is now proposing to move the retaining wall about 4 to 5 feet to right at the edge of the wetland, again with the goal of pulling the trail further from the home. In addition, the homeowner would like the Council to consider narrowing the trail for additional separation. Administrator Statz stated if Council agrees to moving the easement to that particular spot and if we can accommodate a change in the trail from an 8 foot bituminous trail to a 6 foot concrete walk design which will add some additional separation from the trail to the home and with the new equipment, we can accommodate a smaller trail for plowing. He state that the homeowner had a petition in regards to the trail and most of the residence agreed except for one property - currently this property is an empty lot. He stated with the move of the easement and trail they would get about 11 feet from the trail to the home and the homeowner is willing to pay for the easement. A discussion ensued regarding the easement, cost, moving the retaining wall by the wetland, design of the wall, move the trail further away from the property, whether or not to use concrete or asphalt, width of the trail, what equipment would be needed to remove snow (truck or tool cat), whether or the City plows this trail and the clarification that this will be part of the trail system. Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member King to Approve the revised trail layout to allow for the option as shown on the attached figure (shown in the packet) and authorizing city staff to record a revised easement encompassing the new trail location. All in favor. Motion carried. Page 3 of 6