Laserfiche WebLink
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />August 10, 2022 <br /> <br />that and in the agreement, they were not to sell while the Main Street Market was going on. <br />Administrator Statz read the clauses in the agreement. Mayor Love asked if this amendment was <br />an after the fact. Administrator Statz said yes. Council Member Mosher stated that he was not sure <br />what they were going sell and maybe we should invite them to be a part of our Main Street Market. <br />Administrator Statz stated that this was during their show, after Main Street Market closed. <br />Council Member Koski mentioned that there is a clause about insurance and liability that the City <br />would not be liable. Administrator Statz stated that the agreement helps protect us. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Mosher, seconded by Council Member King to Approve <br />Consent Agenda Items #4 as Presented. All in favor. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Item #5 – Council Member King asked for clarifications on this. He asked if there ever was a <br />policy previously. Administrator Statz stated that we had 2 to 3 similar requests and wanted to <br />streamline this policy and treat everyone equally. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member King, seconded by Council Member Mosher to Approve <br />Consent Agenda Items #5 as Presented. All in favor. Motion carried. <br /> <br />VIII. OLD BUSINESS <br /> <br />1. Alternative Trail Design – Old Mill Estates <br /> <br />Administrator Statz stated some time ago Council discussed the possibility of moving a portion of <br />the planned bituminous trail adjacent to 1844 Old Mill Court to a boardwalk that would run through <br />the wetland and pull the trail away from the home to enhance privacy. After researching and <br />pricing out the boardwalk option, it became clear that it would be cost-prohibitive. The homeowner <br />is now proposing to move the retaining wall about 4 to 5 feet to right at the edge of the wetland, <br />again with the goal of pulling the trail further from the home. In addition, the homeowner would <br />like the Council to consider narrowing the trail for additional separation. Administrator Statz stated <br />if Council agrees to moving the easement to that particular spot and if we can accommodate a <br />change in the trail from an 8 foot bituminous trail to a 6 foot concrete walk design which will add <br />some additional separation from the trail to the home and with the new equipment, we can <br />accommodate a smaller trail for plowing. He state that the homeowner had a petition in regards to <br />the trail and most of the residence agreed except for one property - currently this property is an <br />empty lot. He stated with the move of the easement and trail they would get about 11 feet from <br />the trail to the home and the homeowner is willing to pay for the easement. <br /> <br />A discussion ensued regarding the easement, cost, moving the retaining wall by the wetland, design <br />of the wall, move the trail further away from the property, whether or not to use concrete or asphalt, <br />width of the trail, what equipment would be needed to remove snow (truck or tool cat), whether or <br />the City plows this trail and the clarification that this will be part of the trail system. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member King to Approve the <br />revised trail layout to allow for the option as shown on the attached figure (shown in the <br />packet) and authorizing city staff to record a revised easement encompassing the new trail <br />location. All in favor. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />