2023-05-02 P & Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

behind or to the side of primary buildings; surface parking lots along major street frontage are not allowed in the core area; ng facilities along major streets or side streets in order to maintain a pedestrian friendly environment within the Mixed-Use Corridors. Below, the two preferred options put forward by the developer are discussed and must be considered in relationship to the cityÓs zoning code and, by reference, the Downtown Master Plan and Development Guidelines. Option A Î Building in Rear, Parking in Front Pros: Maximizes potential for future expansion, should the property to the northeast become available. Offers safety and convenience to customers with parking spots closest to the front door. Allows for future drive-thru geometry if property to the northeast becomes available. Does not require power lines to be buried or relocated. Cons: Does not meet the intent of the Downtown Master Plan & Development Guidelines, with regard to: o Building placement at the build-to line (right-of-way) o Placement of parking in the rear Option B Î Building in Front, Parking in Rear Pros: Meets the intent of the Downtown Master Plan & Development Guidelines, with regard to: o Building placement at the build-to line (right-of-way) o Placement of parking in the rear Requires power lines to be buried or relocated. Cons: Should the property to the northeast become available, future expansion would be limited to the construction of a second, stand alone building, which may reduce efficiencies in site design, etc. Raises safety concerns, with customers needing to park in the rear and walk around the building to the front door. This may also be viewed as an inconvenience to customers, especially those with disabilities. Does not allow for drive-thru geometry. Analysis, Recommendations, and Next Steps: