Laserfiche WebLink
Having said all this, the fund goes into deficit in 2025 with the purchase of the new dump <br />truck and stays in deficit with the purchase of the second dump truck. These are once in <br />20+ year purchases. <br />It doesnÓt seem to make sense to raise the annual contribution too high just to cover these <br />expenditures and then drop down again after these two purchases. That defeats the <br />process Council has followed of making incremental changes and keeping tax levy <br />increases on a low, steady basis. <br />Staff would propose that we get a one-time infusion of cash from the Water and Sewer <br />funds since they have not contributed to the replacement fund in recent memory. Much <br />of the equipment included also serves these enterprise funds. With cash on hand of <br />$3,609,000 and $2,585,000 respectively, and only modest capital outlays planned, it <br />would not hurt either to transfer $300,000 each to the capital fund. That would keep the <br />capital fund positive through 2031 with only a one-year deficit which corrects itself in <br />2032 if everything happens as planned. An alternative would be to start making annual <br />transfers from the utility funds with a lower one-time cash infusion. <br /> <br />Remaining unaddressed in this analysis are several big questions. The Park & Recreation <br />Committee and the City Council need to decide how to proceed with the skate park, <br />hockey rink, and either remodeling or replacing the warming house. We also need <br />updated quotes to replace existing playground equipment. While much of the cost for <br />these improvements is programmed into the Park Dedication Fund Capital Improvement <br />Plan, the General FundÓs Capital Equipment Replacement Fund should also contribute. <br />Essentially, the General Fund should pay for the equivalent of replacement and the Park <br />Dedication Fund should pay for the ÐupgradeÑ costs. <br /> <br />Street Projects Fund <br />Expenditures <br />Staff used the 2022 Thin Overlay and City Hall Parking Lot project as the new cost <br />standard. That cost has been inflated by 3% for each year in the schedule beyond that <br />base level cost. The cost breakdown percentages in 2022 between Parking Lot and <br />Streets is from the Feasibility Report that the City Council used as a basis for ordering the <br />project. <br />Every street and trail segment is resurfaced at least once during this timeframe through <br />2040. Based on current conditions and the expected life of the underground utilities, there <br />are no full-depth reconstructions anticipated. The streets and sidewalks are all scheduled <br />for a mill and thin overlay based on the City EngineerÓs experience. <br />Revenues <br />Staff has updated the estimate of revenues from special assessments to include our <br />experience on the 2022 project. We now are estimating that roughly one half of all <br />project assessments will be paid in the current year. For the remaining half, we assume <br />they will be repaid equally over three years of assessments received from Anoka County <br /> <br />