Laserfiche WebLink
City of Centerville <br />City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes <br />June 28, 2023 <br /> <br />Assistant City Administrator Lewis stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission also held a public <br />hearing for a request for a Planned Unit Development for an Interim Use Permit (IUP). She stated that a <br />draft IUP was contained in Council’s packet. She also stated that the IUP was for a period of five years <br />with a current tenant (salon) signing a lease for that same period with it affording that through that period, <br />the owner, Propel Investments, would be preparing for redevelopment of four contiguous parcels in the <br />downtown area. <br /> <br />Attorney Glaser drafted a memorandum and Interim Use Permit subsequent to the Commission meeting <br />which was contained in Council’s packet. He reviewed those documents with them and stated that an <br />additional requirement was added following the meeting pertaining to the addition of screening/fence <br />along the westerly property line/rear parking lot ensuring that individuals were not accessing the trail or <br />vice versa. He stated the Building Official would be responsible for the approval of screening/fencing. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding a fence along the northerly property lines, adding costs to the property <br />owner, not knowing if a problem is happening. Owner, Mr. Patrick Walsh addressed Council stating that <br />there has not been a problem in the past in that area and that there were bushes/trees there. There was <br />additional concern regarding the types of businesses that could operate in the location and Attorney <br />Glaser reviewed that section of the IUP for Council and added that any business would need to be related <br />to those services stated. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Taylor, seconded by Council Member King to Approve the Planned <br />Unit Development for an Interim Use Permit as Presented. All in favor. Motion carrieda. <br /> <br />3. Concrete Sidewalk Replacement, New Sidewalk, Recycling Pads <br /> <br />Assistant City Administrator Lewis stated that the Public Works Director forwarded Requests for <br />Proposals for sidewalk replacement, installation of a new sidewalk at Old Mill Court/Laramee Lane and <br />recycling container pads at City Hall. She stated that subsequent to receiving two quotes, the Public <br />Works Director’s recommendation was to approve the quote from L’Allier Concrete, Inc. ($57,315) with <br />an additional 10% ($62,000) for contingencies. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the large differences between the two quotes, quality of the product, <br />uniformity in services provided, warranties, the ability to work with the contractor to ascertain direct <br />specifications prior to entering into an agreement for services, inspection process, the possibility of a <br />contractor bidding but truly not wanted the work and proper specification given by the Public Works <br />Director. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Koski, seconded by Council Member Taylor to Approve the Quote <br />from L’Allier Concrete, Inc. in an amount of $57,315 with an additional 10% for contingencies in <br />an amount not to exceed $62,000. <br /> <br />Discussion took place regarding if subsequent to completing the work, the work was determined to be <br />substandard would the contractor be forced to fulfill its requirements. Attorney Glaser stated that <br />performance standards are spelled out in a standard contract and they would have to fulfill those <br />requirements and if not, they could be taken to court. <br /> <br />All in favor. Motion carried. <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />