My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-04-03 P & R Packet
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
2024
>
2024-04-03 P & R Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2024 12:51:45 PM
Creation date
3/29/2024 12:50:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> <br />G.Open meeting law exceptions <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.01, subd. 3. <br />There are seven exceptions to the open meeting law that authorize the <br /> <br />closure of meetings to the public. Under these exceptions some meetings <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. 1 <br />(d). <br />may be closed, and some meetings must be closed. Before a meeting is <br />See Closing a Meeting from <br />closed under any of the exceptions, the council must state on the record <br />DPO. <br />See LMC MemberLearn <br />the specific grounds permitting the meeting to be closed and describe the <br />course, How to Close a <br />subject to be discussed. <br />Meeting, for more <br />information <br />DPO 14-005. <br />The commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Administration has <br />DPO 13-012. <br />advised that a member of the public body (and not its attorney) must make <br />DPO 14-014. <br />the statement on the record. The open meeting law does not define the <br />phrase “on the record,” but the commissioner has advised that the phrase <br />should be interpreted to mean a verbal statement in open session. <br /> Free Press v. County of Blue <br />The commissioner has also advised that citing the specific statutory <br />Earth, 677 N.W.2d 471 <br />authority that permits the closed meeting is the simplest way to satisfy the <br />(Minn. Ct. App. 2004). <br />requirement for stating the specific grounds permitting the meeting to be <br />closed. <br />Free Press v. County of Blue <br />Both the commissioner and the Minnesota Court of Appeals have <br />Earth, 677 N.W.2d 471 <br />concluded that something more specific than a general statement is needed <br />(Minn. Ct. App. 2004) <br />(holding that a county’s <br />to satisfy the requirement of providing a description of the subject to be <br />statement that it was closing a <br />discussed. <br />meeting under the attorney- <br />client privilege to discuss <br />“pending litigation” did not <br />satisfy the requirement of <br />describing the subject to be <br />discussed at a closed <br />meeting). <br /> <br />All closed meetings, except those closed as permitted by the attorney- <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. 1 <br />client privilege, must be electronically recorded at the expense of the <br />(d). <br /> <br />public body. Unless otherwise provided by law, the recordings must be <br /> <br />preserved for at least three years after the date of the meeting. <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.04, subd. 5. <br />The same notice requirements that apply to open meetings also apply to <br />closed meetings. For example, if a closed meeting takes place at a regular <br />meeting, the notice requirements for a regular meeting apply. Likewise, if <br />a closed meeting takes place as a special meeting, the notice requirements <br />for a special meeting apply. <br /> <br />1. Meetings that may be closed <br /> <br />The public body may choose to close certain meetings. The following <br />types of meetings may be closed: <br />League of Minnesota Cities Handbook for Minnesota Cities 7/11/2023 <br />Meetings, Motions, Resolutions, and Ordinances Chapter 7 | Page 14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.