My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-05-07 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2024
>
2024-05-07 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2024 11:33:21 AM
Creation date
5/2/2024 11:31:48 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 7, 2024 <br />Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission <br />Page 6 of 12 <br />RE: Ten Nineteen Development LLC, LaLonde Property, PUD Preliminary Development Plan <br />Parking <br />There will be 110 heated parking spaces under the building and 56 surface spaces, which comes <br />to about 1.6 spaces/unit. Centerville’s standard zoning requires 2 spaces per unit, which is <br />generally excessive. The parking proposed is very typical of suburban apartment projects and <br />should be more than adequate. <br />Landscaping <br />The Zoning Code in 156.178 requires one overstory tree per 3,000 sq ft of lot area and one <br />foundation planting of some kind for every 10 lineal feet of building façade or parking lot <br />perimeter. The landscape plan proposes 40 overstory trees and 186 foundation plantings, both of <br />which meet the code standard. <br />The comments above about the lower level façade on the west side mention the landscaped <br />mesh screen, which would be part of the required foundation planting. With a different <br />architectural treatment of that façade a different type and mix of plant materials might be <br />proposed, but it could still meet the code standard for foundation plantings. <br />Architecture & Building Materials <br />The narrative notes the building materials and architectural context of the design. The roof peak <br />alludes to the historic schoolhouse which is a nice detail. Generally, the materials are attractive, <br />well-designed and acceptable. Two elements were noted previously – the window treatment <br />which might be more evocative of historic French-Canadian influence for a large building like this <br />and the tall west facade which we suggest needs some kind of design attention. <br />Lighting <br />The lighting plan submitted shows exterior lighting: three light poles at the east edge of the parking <br />lot on the east side of the building, an additional light pole on the north side garage entry drive, a <br />light over the parking level entry on the north side of the building, and two lights on the west side <br />of the building overlooking the patio. Light levels are generally acceptable with the exception of <br />the north side of the garage entry drive, where light levels spilling over the adjacent residential lot <br />line are over 1.0 footcandle, a generally accepted maximum standard for light spillage at the <br />property line. A minor adjustment to the fixture(s) or the plan could remedy this. <br />Setbacks <br />There are no specific setback requirements in the M-2 zoning district. The Zoning Code notes that <br />these are to be set within the PUD. Setbacks proposed are 28 to 92 ft on the north side, 90 ft on the <br />east side, 10 ft to the south (front: Westview Street), and 116 ft to west (front: Main Street). <br />Traffic <br />A traffic report from TC^2 concludes that the project will not pose significant traffic issues. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.