Laserfiche WebLink
the adjacent structures to a minimum of 50 feet; and See also Floodplain Chapter <br />and additional requirements for shorelands. <br />In summary, the existing zoning, along with the other provisions of the City Code would <br />allow: <br />Min. Lot Width – 100’ (measured at the front setback line and the shoreline) <br />Min. Lot Size – 15,000 sf <br />Lake Setback – 75’ or average of neighboring setbacks (but no less than 50’) <br />Grandfathering Rights <br />Existing homes on the two parcels, along with their accessory structures are within the <br />lakeside setbacks, as legal non-conformities since they were constructed prior to the <br />setbacks being in place. However, this does not afford any “grandfathering” rights in a <br />redevelopment scenario. It only means that a structure could be completely rebuilt in the <br />same footprint as the existing structure. <br />The Proposal <br />The landowner has proposed 3 concepts (see attached). All three would require some <br />measure of flexibility, under a Planned Unit Development (PUD): <br /> <br />3-Lot Concept <br />This concept seeks to align with the R-2A Single Family Residential zoning district, with <br />80-foot lot widths and 30-foot front yard setbacks. Assuming the city was willing to <br />rezone the property and by utilizing a public street, the only flexibility needed through a <br />PUD would be to the shoreland requirements (not the underlying zoning district <br />requirements). <br /> <br />With this concept, it may be possible to forgo the formation of a homeowners association, <br />since the street would be public and the homes would each sit on their own lot, without a <br />common area surrounding them. <br /> <br />5-Lot Concepts <br />Each of these two concepts would utilize a private drive for access to the lots and would <br />require flexibility in design, afforded through a PUD. To offset the relaxation of zoning <br />standards, enhanced stormwater features would be provided, such as a filtration strip of <br />native plantings along the shoreline. The PUD setbacks to the lake and smaller lot widths <br />would be similar to those afforded to the recent Bayview Villas development, nearby. <br />The main difference in the two concepts is the home style and layout. Mr. Marshall will <br />be on hand to describe the various units contemplated by each. <br /> <br />With the private street (shared driveway), a homeowner’s association would be required <br />to maintain the roadway and other common areas. The organization of this association <br />would be similar to that of Bayview Villas. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />