My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-09-03 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2024
>
2024-09-03 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2025 4:01:54 PM
Creation date
8/30/2024 4:30:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
require the missing parking spaces to be held in a “landscape reserve” in case the need <br />arises. If the applicant wishes to address parking needs through a CUP, they would need <br />to apply for one and go through the public hearing process. <br />Landscaping <br />City code requires one tree per 3,000 sf of the site area. At 1.4 acres, the site would <br />require 20 trees. The sketch appears to show 4 trees along the boulevard. At least 16 <br />additional trees would be required on the site to meet city code. There appears to be room <br />around the perimeter of the site. <br />The code’s shrub requirement is one shrub for every 10 feet of building and parking area <br />perimeter. The building’s perimeter is 432 ft, plus the parking area’s perimeter of 170 ft <br />(excludes perimeter adjacent to building and perimeter of drive and loading areas). This <br />brings the total perimeter to 602 lineal feet, for a planting requirement of 60 shrubs. The <br />sketch currently shows 21 shrubs. An additional 39 shrubs would be required. There are <br />plenty of spaces for these plantings. <br /> <br />The requirement of 10% of any lot being green space appears to be met. The requirement <br />of 3% of the surface area of land within a parking area appears to be met with the <br />landscaped areas adjacent to the parking lot. <br /> <br />Setbacks <br />Setbacks and other minimums for lot and building size appear to be met by the proposed <br />building and its location on the lot. <br /> <br />Architecture <br />The architecture depicted could, perhaps use some "contrasting architectural features" as <br />described in code, and the wall materials are on this agenda for review. <br /> <br />Staff is requesting the Commission review the concept sketch and provide feedback to <br />the applicant so they can make final revisions and submit a formal Site Plan Review <br />application and, if necessary, a Conditional Use Permit application. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.