My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-10-09 CC Packet - Revised
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2024
>
2024-10-09 CC Packet - Revised
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2024 11:11:02 AM
Creation date
10/9/2024 11:10:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />City Council Meeting Minutes <br />September 11, 2024 <br />He stated that staff inspected the park, determined that somethings could be completed to make it better <br />in the mean time without feeling bad about replacing the equipment in 5 years. He stated that Council <br />will be addressed regarding minor expenditures for repairs and making experiences better to Royal <br />Meadows in the meantime. He stated that it would be less than $5,000 for the accommodations. <br />Administrator Statz stated that funding would come from the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund <br />($300,000) which you would add $100,000 at this meeting as you intended from the previous meeting and <br />Park Dedication Fee ($127,000) and totaled $427,000. He also stated that the Park Dedication Fund <br />contains approximately $400,000 and has a debt of $850,000 and whether or not is it good to keep the <br />debt on the records. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding whether or not to forgive that loan, putting adaptive equipment in Royal <br />Meadows using Park Dedication Fees, wish list items or Capital Improvement Plan which is dependent <br />on future development, can we complete Royal Meadows prior to the 5 year plan, the committee wants to <br />see equipment fixed, uses by everyone, LaMotte Park was the premium park and others from outside of <br />the community use the park, where to place the equipment, going out for bids, adaptive equipment being <br />integrated for all to use, if equipment is usage that was removed from LaMotte it may be placed in another <br />park, things that people will see their tax dollars being used for. Administrator Statz stated that forgiving <br />the loan would not speed up the replacement process. He explained that Park Dedication Fees can only <br />involve placement of new equipment not replacement of existing equipment. Administrator Statz stated <br />that it would be best to use Capital Replacement Funds to replace existing equipment and then utilize Park <br />Dedication Fees that would be above and beyond just replacing existing equipment. Administrator Statz <br />felt that maybe a better time to have a discussion of forgiving the loan, it should be at a later time. <br /> <br />Administrator Statz showed a photo of the stair/platform that needed to be replaced at Royal Meadows <br />and stated that he anticipated it to cost under $1,500, Council Member Sweeney asked if alternates to the <br />bid for the equipment for LaMotte which would contain repairs to other parks. Administrator Statz stated <br />that he felt that the $427,000 + $45,000 in repairs to Acorn Creek Park it was a very lucrative bidding <br />opportunity for vendors. Administrator Statz stated that he would be showing each vendor the Capital <br />Equipment Replacement Plan which will also entice a vendor in becoming the vendor of choice for the <br />City. <br /> <br />Council Member Koski asked for the advantages of holding on to the debt and Administrator Statz <br />explained that Park Dedication Fees are paid by developers per lot or unit for apartment buildings, etc. <br />Each new person in town creates a new need for park equipment to be available. He stated that State <br />legislature had allowed a fee to be charged to developers but it must be based on something. He stated <br />that you have to show what you are going to build, have a total and by total buildout how many new homes <br />or units would there be and divide them and come up with a per unit cost. He explained that the CityÓs <br />current fee is $3,000, that it is competitive with neighboring communities and ensuring that the fee being <br />charged is defensible if a developer were to challenge that. He stated that having the debt is an item on <br />the list as the funding was pre-spent and owing. He explained that the listing for park amenities that are <br />desired may stand on its own to justify the $3,000 fee as it has been some time since the items have been <br />looked and bids received. He also stated that neighboring communities have also not increased their fees <br />as they want to vie for construction and be developer friendly. Discussion ensued regarding leaving the <br />debt, with the addition of homes it would provide an opportunity to increase the tax levy, placing <br />additional funding in the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund and having additional ways of paying <br />down the debt. Mayor Love explained that the debt was from the installation of the trail system. <br /> <br />Page 8 of 11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.