Laserfiche WebLink
dry" i <br />'�" 1,�?td5(d :lyt?a�t�s ,�Cree,r. C'�i'FetertPraF� <br />wrauw�m�mr ���w��i�r�wr�Mr���rrc�r i i,Nwma�,a�,wuwwwr�wrar� rvm� � <br />rid„ 6.5F-4Z9 3 Z12rnw^ria.C6.SY.42PP629 <br />Memorandum <br />Date: March 1, 2024 <br />To: Honorable Chair and Planning Commission Members <br />From: Mark Statz, PE — City Administrator/Engineer <br />Subject: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) <br />Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) for 2 1 ' Avenue South <br />No Rise Certificate Application <br />Recently, questions surrounding the interpretation of the city's zoning code have <br />highlighted some deficiencies in existing language. In some cases, the language could <br />have been more detailed or clear. In others, there were seemingly conflicting passages. <br />Still others appeared to just be typos. The purpose of this public hearing and discussion <br />is to work towards a clean-up of as many of these issues as we can. <br />Issue I — Table of Allowed Uses <br />Multi-Famil% Uses <br />While reviewing a building permit for 7353 20' Avenue (existing home being converted <br />to a duplex), staff noticed that the newly approved zoning (R2A) did not allow "Single - <br />Family attached dwellings with up to two dwelling units per building". On this line in <br />the Table of Allowed Uses, it shows a "P" in the R2 District, but not in the R2A District. <br />This is clearly a typo, as the purpose of the R2A is to support duplex style development. <br />This style of development is and has not been allowed, historically, in the R2 zone. <br />Staff is recommending that the P for the "Single -Family attached dwellings with up to <br />two dwelling units per building" use category be nim ed tarot the R2 column to the l „ ik,, <br />cclluinri as has always been intended. <br />Mixed Use Residential <br />A use category labeled "Single-family attached or detached dwellings where in <br />combination with multi -family dwellings on the development property meet the district <br />density goal" is show as a allowed use via PUD in the R3 district. However, this use <br />would also be compatible with the M1 and M2 districts, as a PUD. <br />Staff recommends adding a "PUD" designation in the M1 and M2 district columns for <br />this use category. <br />