Laserfiche WebLink
PUD Land Use and Conventional Zoning District & Shoreland Guidelines <br /> <br />City Code Section 1007.024 details the PUD, Planned Unit Development requirements. The <br />purpose of the PUD is to provide a zoning district that grants flexibility from certain <br />conventional zoning regulations in order to achieve public benefits that may not otherwise be <br />obtained under standard zoning regulations. These public benefits are detailed in City Code <br />Section 1007.024(2) and discussed later in this report. <br /> <br />City Code Section 1007.024(4) details the PUD Land Use and correlating conventional zoning <br />district standards. These conventional zoning district standards serve as guidelines but may be <br />departed from to accomplish public value purposes. <br /> <br />A summary of PUD public benefit vs PUD flexibility is provided at the end of this staff report. <br /> <br />Conventional Zoning District Guidelinesand PUD Flexibility <br />Lot Width and Lot Sizes <br />The attached PUD Land Useand Conventional Zoning District Guidelines Chartdetails the PUD <br />Land Use and correlating conventional residential zoning district requirements. The chart also <br />compares the proposed development to these guidelines. <br />The development proposes R-1X, Single Family Executive (90ft), R-1, Single Family (80ft) and R- <br />2, Two Family single family lots (65ft) and 55ft wide lots. It also proposes R-3, Medium Density <br />and R-4, High Density townhomes. <br /> <br />PUD flexibility is required for the 55ft wide single family lots and high density townhome base <br />lots. <br /> <br />Staff Comments: <br />1.Per the subdivision ordinance, minimum lot area for urban lots shall consist of buildable <br />land exclusive of utility transmission easements or water course easements that <br />encumber lot development. The minimum lot areas shall also consist of buildable land <br />exclusive of oversized easements or buffers. <br />2. Staff suggests the 55ft wide lots be at least 130ft deep. This would be consistent with <br />Watermark. <br /> <br />Setbacks <br /> <br />The following charts compare the conventional City ordinance requirements to the proposed <br />setbacks. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />