My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-08-12 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2025
>
2025-08-12 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2025 2:52:24 PM
Creation date
8/8/2025 2:52:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 6, 2025 <br />Centerville Planning & Zoning Commission <br />Page 8 of 8 <br />Reference: Zoning Code Issues & Definitions <br />though? For example, a lot that is 11,000 SF in size would be permitted 220 SF. Using the 2% as a starting <br />point, a potential new breakdown could look like the following as shown in Table 2. The commission should <br />discuss whether the proposed are appropriate for the city. <br />Table 2: Potential standards for Centerville. <br />Lot Size Maximum combined size # of Detached Accessory <br />allowance of all Detached Structures <br />Accessory Structures <br />Under 11,000 SF <br />240 square feet Two <br /> <br />11,001 Î 14,999 SF <br />300 square feet Two <br /> <br />15,000 Î 17,499 SF <br />350 square feet Two <br /> <br />17,500 or more <br />400 square feet Three <br /> <br />The commission should discuss whether something along the lines of Table 2 would be appropriate for the <br />city. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />If there is consensus among the Planning and Zoning Commission on the previously reviewed issues <br />presented here, the Planning and Zoning Commission can recommend the proposed amendments to the <br />City Council for approval or denial. Included is a Draft ÒA,Ó with changes as reviewed at the June and July <br />meetings. Draft ÒBÓ includes potential changes to the definition of a front lot line and the introduction of a <br />street side setback. <br />If there is a consensus among the Planning and Zoning Commission on whether to move forward with <br />changes to the standards for detached residential accessory structures, staff would recommend holding a <br />public hearing to review a draft ordinance at a future meeting. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.