My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-11-28 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2001
>
2001-11-28 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2007 3:47:28 PM
Creation date
1/3/2007 3:46:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mayor Swedberg indicated Council understood what Mr. Tratar was saying and indicated <br />that the City needs to find the right words to make it consistent throughout the City. <br /> <br />Ms. Tratar of 171 0 Peltier Lake Drive asked if the Ordinance could be worded to apply <br />only to existing properties and not for new construction. She then commented that by <br />driving around the City she has concluded that they are the only comer lot without a <br />garage. City Attorney Hoeft indicated that would be possible to word the Ordinance as <br />Ms. Tratar had suggested but said the City should stay away from making ordinances that <br />apply to a single piece of property. <br /> <br />Ms. Tratar indicated that if they could get approval and get the footings in before the <br />ground freezes they could work on the garage in the cold. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission was not meeting <br />again until the beginning of December. <br /> <br />Shelly Olson of Chetak, Wisconsin indicated she was in attendance for the dog kennel <br />ordinance change and asked if the change had been made to allow for dog kennels in the <br />industrial park. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />did not have a problem with allowing dog kennels in the industrial park with a special use <br />permi t. <br /> <br />Ms. Olson indicated that she drives two hours to come to the meetings and asked if her <br />change would be approved at this meeting. She then indicated that she would need to get <br />her special use permit before going any farther with her contractors. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the use was approved and then <br />explained that Ms. Olson would need to work with Mr. Palzer and Ms. Moore-Sykes to <br />determine what needed to be done to obtain the special use pernlit. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the ordinance change would be effective around the first <br />of the year and explained that Ms. Olson would then be back before the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission to discuss the special use permit and obtain approval of the special <br />use permit and the preliminary plat. <br /> <br />Mr. Palzer indicated that the previous version of Ordinance #4 had allowed for a 30-foot <br />setback on comer lots. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg asked whether there would be any utilities in the 35-foot setback area. <br />Mr. Palzer indicated that there should not be. Mr. Tratar indicated he had checked and <br />the utilities are within the 15- foot City right-of-way. <br /> <br />Page 5 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.