My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-09-26 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2001
>
2001-09-26 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2007 9:43:08 AM
Creation date
1/19/2007 9:41:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />5. Officer Gleason Request to Use City Hall for Training Session <br /> <br />It was the consent of Council to allow Officer Gleason to use City Hall for a training <br />program on September 22, 2001. <br /> <br />x. CONSENT AGENDA <br /> <br />1. The City ofCenterville August 9, through August 22, 2001 Expenditures. <br />2. Centennial Fire District Expenditures <br />3. Pay Request #2 - LaMotte Park ($61,189.27) <br />4. Final Pay Request - Lift Station #2 ($8,500.29) <br />5. SunRamp Solutions, Inc - Wheels Park ($12,952.20 <br />6. Earl F. Anderson, Inc. - Wheels Park ($26,222.88) <br />7. Sathe & Associates Executive Search - Administrator ($5,698.37) <br /> <br />Council Member Travis requested that Item 3 be removed from the Consent Agenda for <br />discussion. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Capra to <br />approve Consent Agenda Items 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. and 7 as {>resented. All in favor. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Council Member Travis indicated he was concerned that the costs for the project were <br />much higher than the estimate. He then asked if it was possible to renegotiate the unit <br />price because the costs were more than 5% over the estimate. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson indicated he was not sure but said he could research the matter. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the City would have recourse against the <br />prior engineer because the soil was not as it was expected to be. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson explained that there was an excessive layer of clay that had to be removed <br />that was thicker than expected. He then indicated he did not think the City would have <br />recourse against the former engineer because the City was having trouble in that area and <br />dug it and filled it with sand and put the clay back. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers asked the City Attorney if the City could renegotiate <br />the unit price. City Attorney Hoeft indicated he would need to review the contract. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Capra to table <br />pay request #2. LaMotte Park for further research. All in favor. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg was not present for the vote. <br /> <br />Page 26 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.