My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-11-29 Council.TNT
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
2006-11-29 Council.TNT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2007 11:18:56 AM
Creation date
2/2/2007 11:17:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />City Council Meeting Minutes <br />November 29, 2006 <br />City Administrator Larson stated that current standards did not take into account current <br />training, certification, and insurance for massage therapy and suggested Council consider <br />changing licensing standards to reflect those changes, perhaps creating a separate <br />category for massage therapy. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra agreed that the ordinance mirrored training and therapy in 2002 and she <br />would be open to forwarding to Planning and Zoning Commission for their review. <br /> <br />City Administrator Larson added that it would be useful to modify facility requirements. <br /> <br />Legal Counsel Glaser specified the need for vigilance, for those people who would abuse <br />nonspecific licensing, as there were different types of massage therapy. He suggested <br />making sure insurance certification was up to date and criminal background checks. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra also inquired about inspections. The applicant responded that inspection <br />was not State regulated but that the Legislature was working on it. Legal Counsel Glaser <br />added that the City would perform inspections and that, in this case, the chiropractic <br />office housing the massage therapy business would be inspected. City Administrator also <br />stated that the ordinance would exempt inspection if the applicant was working for the <br />chiropractor but that she planned to operate a separate business under a joint venture with <br />the chiropractor. <br /> <br />Council Member Lee stated that he wouldn’t want an ordinance restricting a good <br />business from coming into the community, acknowledging opportunity for ordinance <br />violations. Council Member Terway added that there would need to be a way to cover all <br />bases for the people who might not be legitimate, also noting his support for the current <br />applicant’s request. <br /> <br />The applicant commended the City for requiring a criminal history before licensing. <br /> <br />City Administrator Larson stated that the issue of home occupation hadn’t been raised yet <br />but would be expected. Council Member Lakso responded that St. Paul, as an example, <br />required a separate living area from office. Council Member Lee said he favored a <br />business front and that doing business out of people’s houses provided opportunity for <br />crossing the line. Mayor Capra suggested defining “therapist,” rather than using <br />“massage parlor.” <br /> <br />City Administrator Larson said home businesses would be more difficult to police to <br />inspect randomly. He then said he appreciated feedback from Council and would draft <br />something to run by the Planning and Zoning Commission for their next meeting, perhaps <br />separate specifications for massage therapy (requiring 500 hours of training and <br />professional liability) and massage parlor (undergoing more regulation). Legal Counsel <br />Glaser reiterated the need to regulate, to ensure no prostitution, but also acknowledged <br />the need to legitimize professional massage therapy. <br /> <br />Page 13 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.