My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-03-07 P&R Packet
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
1997-2022
>
2007
>
2007-03-07 P&R Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2007 9:53:10 AM
Creation date
3/2/2007 10:53:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Donations Received for the Renovations at Tracie McBride Memorial Park <br /> <br />At this time the committee has received $2,350 in donations from local businesses and Eagle Brook <br />Church. I have filled out the appropriate form requesting funding from the Spring Lake Park Lions <br />Charitable Gambling Funds and sent that back to the Lions. Dead Broke Saddle Club is also <br />considering our request for Charitable Gambling Funds and it is on their agenda for March. <br /> <br />ADA Accessible Trails at 1601 LaMotte Drive <br /> <br />At the February 7, 2007 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Committee Member Amundsen asked <br />Mr. Statz, City Engineer, whether the City was required to have ADA accessible trails in the park at <br />1601 LaMotte Drive. Mr. Statz thought that the trails/walkways could be a porous material, but a <br />walkway directly to a gazebo, for instance, would have to be ADA accessible. He will check on this <br />and report back to the committee. Mr. Statz's response: <br /> <br />This is always a tough question and in talking with others in our office I was met with a number of <br />different interpretations. This is probably a question better asked of your attorney. <br /> <br />However, here is how our firm tends to interpret the Americans with Disabilities Act... <br /> <br />In general, the law talks about providing access to "facilities" which generally means buildings, but <br />can also be interpreted to mean a drinking fountain or a basketball court. In our proposed park, we <br />would probably interpret the Gazebo, fountain, and any other features that are destinations to be <br />"facilities" which need an "accessible route". The park in general or trails that don't go directly to a <br />facility would not necessarily need to meet ADA requirements. <br /> <br />As far as the surfacing is concerned the language is pretty vague as well (see below). <br /> <br />4.5 Ground and Floor Sutfaces. <br /> <br />4.5.1 * General. Ground and floor surfaces along accessible routes and in accessible rooms and <br />spaces including floors, walks, ramps, stairs, and curb ramps, shall be stable, firm, slip-resistant, and <br />shall comply with 4.5. <br /> <br />Generally speaking it just needs to be "stable" and "firm". We generally view gravel and porous <br />pavements as meeting ADA requirements while Wood Chip or "natural" trails would not. I think the <br />law is just asking for us to use our common sense. If a wheelchair can reasonably operate on it, its <br />probably good enough. <br /> <br />As we move along, I will try to provide the parks committee some different options for trail surfacing <br />along with associated prices. Once we get the park laid out, we can have the City Attorney take a <br />quick look to see if there are any other items that may qualify as "facilities". <br /> <br />The question was then passed on to Mr. Kurt Glaser, City Attorney who responded with: <br /> <br />20f3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.