Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Parks & Recreation Committee <br />Meeting Minutes March 7, 2007 <br /> <br />1601 LaMotte Drive - Centenrille Lake ProDerty <br /> <br />The committee scheduled a work session for Wednesday, March 28, 2007 at 6:30 at Centerville City <br />Hall. There is a council meeting scheduled at that time in the Council Chambers so the committee will <br />meet in the offices. The purpose of this work session is to continue park planning for 1601 LaMotte <br />Drive. Ms. Stephan will ensure the meeting is posted. <br /> <br />Naming of Park <br /> <br />City Council tabled the naming of the park 'Hidden Spring Park' until this spring when it can be <br />verified the spring has adequate pressure and will actually be able to be used in some fashion. <br /> <br />ADA Accessible Trails at 1601 LaMotte Drive <br /> <br />At the February 7, 2007 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Committee Member Amundsen asked <br />Mr. Statz, City Engineer, whether the City was required to have ADA accessible trails in the park at <br />1601 LaMotte Drive. Mr. Statz thought that the trails/walkways could be a porous material, but a <br />walkway directly to a gazebo, for instance, would have to be ADA accessible. He will check on this <br />and report back to the committee. Mr. Statz's response: <br /> <br />This is always a tough question and in talking with others in our office I was met with a number of <br />different interpretations. This is probably a question better asked of your attorney. <br /> <br />However, here is how our firm tends to interpret the Americans with Disabilities Act... <br /> <br />In general, the law talks about providing access to "facilities" which generally means buildings, but <br />can also be interpreted to mean a drinking fountain or a basketball court. In our proposed park, we <br />would probably interpret the Gazebo, fountain, and any other features that are destinations to be <br />"facilities" which need an "accessible route". The park in general or trails that don't go directly to a <br />facility would not necessarily need to meet ADA requirements. <br /> <br />As far as the surfacing is concerned the language is pretty vague as well (see below). <br /> <br />4.5 Ground and Floor Surfaces. <br /> <br />4.5.1 * GeneraL Ground and floor surfaces along accessible routes and in accessible rooms and spaces <br />including floors, walks, ramps, stairs, and curb ramps, shall be stable, firm, slip-resistant, and shall <br />comply with 4.5. <br /> <br />Generally speaking it just needs to be "stable" and "firm". We generally view gravel and porous <br />pavements as meeting ADA requirements while Wood Chip or "natural" trails would not. I think the <br />law is just asking for us to use our common sense. If a wheelchair can reasonably operate on it, its <br />probably good enough. <br /> <br />50f6 <br />