Laserfiche WebLink
<br />----- - - --- -- --- --- ------ -- - --- - - - <br /> <br />~e starting point <br /> <br />Municipalities' ability to negotiate cable television franchises and to collect fees for <br />public, educational, and governmental access (pEG), above and beyond franchise fees, <br />continues to face powerful challenges from several sources. <br /> <br />While Congress failed to pass franchising legislation in 2006, the FCC did approve a <br />sweeping franchising order that has the potential to eliminate 100% of the North Metro's <br />PEG fees. The FCC has also issued a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to <br />determine when the new rules, which only apply to competitive video providers such as <br />phone companies, should also apply to incumbent cable operators. At the same time, the <br />Minnesota Legislature has introduced a bill that would provide for state-wide franchising <br />of competitive video providers. The bil~ which could be voted on in 2008, could also <br />eliminate PEG fees. <br /> <br />We go into 2008 with an uneasy feeling. Because the FCC order is being appealed, and <br />we don't yet know the results of the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, or whether <br />state legislation will pass, we will most likely reach 2008 with current sources of funding <br />intact Unfortunately, those funding levels could very possibly be significantly reduced <br />in 2008. <br /> <br />The Commission and Operations Committee have been closely monitoring FCC and <br />legislative activity. The potential loss of such a significant amount of funding could <br />necessitate fundamental changes in the North Metro Telecommunications Commission's <br />operation. Choices will have to be made that could result in loss of services, reductions <br />in franchise fee income for cities, or a combination of both. <br /> <br />While our current franchising procedures and funding mechanisms have allowed the <br />North Metro Telecommunications Commission operation to thrive, the very real threat to <br />our funding presents us with challenges that will most likely need to be addressed in <br />2008. <br /> <br />Our goals for the year reflect that reality. We will continue to provide all of the services <br />our cities, schools, and citizens have come to rely upon, as long as we can. We will also <br />work hard to continue to develop new sources of income, public awareness of our <br />services, and we will do whatever we can to insure our political leaders are well informed <br />regarding the impact changes in franchising laws could have on municipalities and <br />community television. <br /> <br />We look forward to a year of development and growth, but are prepared to make any <br />operational changes necessary, to insure the survival of community television in the <br />North Metro. <br /> <br />~.;) <br />