Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Council Member Sweeney questioned whether the developer could run the trailway through <br />Outlot A. Mr. Cooper stated that Ground Development was willing to locate the trail way where <br />the City required; however, they did not want to pay to build any more trailway than required. <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson questioned the County's requirements for the trailway. Mr. LeBlanc <br />indicated the only requirement he was aware of was the 10-foot wide paved trail. Mr. LeBlanc <br />suggested that the City contact Anoka County in regards to their requirements for same. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers noted if the trailway ran through the north of the development <br />there would be ample space for the trail way as it would run along the force main easement. If it <br />ran to the south, as proposed, the trailway would run through fewer backyards. Council Member <br />Broussard Vickers stated that the developer may need to provide a fence or barrier to discourage <br />wandering onto private property. <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber questioned whether the developer had contacted Anoka County concerning <br />obtaining a permit to access Centerville Road and for determination of required turn lanes. Mr. <br />Cooper stated he had contacted the County and is waiting for a response. Mr. Cooper stated that <br />Mr. Hannah has concurred with Mr. March regarding the need for turn lanes on Centerville Road. <br /> <br />Council Member Sweeney questioned whether the developer intended on installed and entrance <br />monument and Mr. Cooper concurred. <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Mr. March stated that Council needed to ascertain whether it wished to direct the developer to <br />route the trailway north through Outlot A to connect to the force main easement. Mr. Cooper <br />questioned who would be responsible to run the trailway north through Outlot A to the force main <br />easement and Council Member Nelson stated the developer. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft expressed a desire to see the trailway, as dictated by Council, on the <br />preliminary site plan for the development. Council Member Nelson concurred. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that there was a concern raised at the Planning and <br />Zoning meeting for additional traffic being directed on both Center Street and Centerville Road. <br /> <br />Mr. March suggested Council discuss the number of lots within the development and the size of <br />the lots. He also suggested Council discuss the cul-de-sac to the north of the development and <br />whether the trailway should be run north through or along Outlot A. Mayor Wilharber requested <br />clarification as to the number of lots within Pheasant Marsh. <br /> <br />Mr. March stated Council should determine whether it was in favor of allowing the MUSA swap. <br />Mr. March stated that the requested MUSA swap lacks incentive for the City; however, the <br />development cannot proceed without one. <br /> <br />Council Member Sweeney questioned the portion of the property the developer would commence <br />building first if the City granted the MUSA swap. Mr. Cooper stated the most southern portion, <br />closest to Centerville Road would be deemed Phase I. <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson stated she felt there was no incentive for Council to grant the requested <br />swap. Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she did not see a reason to deny the request. <br /> <br />Council Member Sweeney stated that an advantage of granting the MUSA swap would be <br />controlling traffic on secondary streets. <br /> <br />Page 5 of 15 <br />