Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mayor Wilharber stated that the Hunter's Crossing development offered an additional $17,000 in <br />park dedication fees as an incentive to the City for granting a MUSA swap. Council Member <br />Broussard Vickers clarified that the City did not grant a MUSA swap in regards to the Hunter's <br />Crossing development. However, the City granted development a year earlier than that earmarked <br />by the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers clarified the City did not agree to a MUSA swap for Hunter's <br />Crossing. The City agreed to allow Hunter's Crossing to come in early for an additional fee. <br /> <br />Council Member Sweeney noted no additional land was being brought into MUSA by allowing <br />the swap. Allowing the swap would keep construction traffic out ofthe developed area. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers stated she liked the layout of the development. She then <br />expressed concern for home values within the development as the land is not very high and may <br />not be conducive to allowing full basements. She indicated Council may wish to require R-5 size <br />requirements. <br /> <br />Council Member Sweeney stated that there were some issues with the City's R-5 zoning <br />requirements as there were two (2) story home plans that would not comply. Council Member <br />Broussard Vickers stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission was researching the matter. <br /> <br />Mr. Cooper stated that there would be a few lots that a rambler-lookout could be built on. <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber questioned whether sewer and water were available on the east side of <br />Centerville Road. Mr. Peterson concurred. Mayor Wilharber questioned whether residents on the <br />west side of Centerville Road would be assessed for installation of same. Mr. March stated yes; <br />however, they would not have to pay the assessment until the property is able to connect to same. <br />Mr. Peterson concurred. <br /> <br />Mr. Wes Schoeberlein, 6906 Centerville Road, expressed the following concerns regarding the <br />development: cul-de-sac access to his driveway and traffic, providing easement for driveway <br />access and impact of same on the size of lots 3 and 4, the trailway crossing his driveway if it were <br />to go to the north, location of the cul-de-sac as it has been proposed and the removal of trees to <br />connect his driveway, and approval by the City without addressing his concerns. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned the location of the property lines between Mr. <br />Schoeberlein property and his neighbors. Mr. Schoeberlein stated he was unclear to their location, <br />but believed a line of hybrid willow trees is located on same. <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson questioned whether Mr. Schoeberlein and Mr. Lundblad's properties <br />were equal in size. Mr. Schoeberlein believed they were similar in size. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned how the developer intended to connect Mr. <br />Schoeberlein's driveway to the cul-de-sac if it did not abut Mr. Schoeberlein's property. Mr. <br />Cooper stated that they would provide an easement over the property in question. Mr. Cooper <br />showed Council Member Broussard Vickers on the map how the developer intended to connect <br />the driveways to the cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber questioned whether Mr. Schoeberlein and Mr. Lundblad were connected to <br />water and sewer. Mr. Schoeberlein stated that both were connected to sewer. <br /> <br />Page 6 of 15 <br />