Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mayor Wilharber questioned whether access could be provided to the two (2) exception properties <br />over the Short Street easement area. Mr. Peterson stated that Short Street was actually a ditch that <br />needed to remain in place and may need to be upgraded. As such, accessing the two (2) properties <br />would not be feasible. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she approved of the following: MUSA swap; the <br />need for the cul-de-sac issue to be resolved; lot sizes, providing a variety for buyers to choose <br />from; the trailway run north through or along Outlot A, and permits obtained by the developer to <br />access the development from Centerville Road. Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that <br />the above stated items could be addressed in the developer's agreement. <br /> <br />Mr. March stated that the City was legally required to either approve or deny the preliminary plat <br />request within sixty (60) days of application. City Attorney Hoeft noted Council could approve <br />the preliminary plat subject to conditions. <br /> <br />Mr. Hannah, Ground Development, stated that he had spoken with Mr. Lundblad who expressed <br />an understanding of the fact that development was inevitable in this area and requested the cul-de- <br />sac issues be resolved and a barrier or berm be erected to curtail residents from accessing <br />Centerville Road via their driveways. <br /> <br />Council Member Travis stated he approved of the MUSA swap and would have no problem <br />approving the preliminary plat with the agreed upon conditions. <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Mr. Hoeft again expressed a desire to receive a drawing showing the trailway running north <br />through or along Outlot A. Mr. Hoeft questioned whether the developer would need to compress <br />lot sizes in order to allow for the trailway. Mr. Cooper stated he did not believe that it would be <br />necessary to comply with the City's requirements. <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson stated she had not heard the developer commit to running the trailway <br />through or along Outlot A. Mr. Cooper once again stated that Ground Development was willing <br />to locate the trailway where the City required; however, they did not want to pay to build any <br />more trailway than required. <br /> <br />Council Member Sweeney stated that with the exception of lot Sizes, he approved of the <br />development. <br /> <br />Council Member Travis questioned who would be assessed for City services along <br />Centerville Road and what the assessment amount would be. Mr. Hoeft stated that it would be <br />impossible to estimate the dollar amount of the assessment this early in the process. <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber stated he believed the affected property owners would be himself and another <br />property owner. <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber questioned whether he would be assessed for City services if he is not able to <br />connect to sewer service. Mr. Hoeft stated that Mayor Wilharber would be assessed for only <br />services that benefit his property. The value of the benefit would need to be determined prior to a <br />dollar amount given for the assessments. Mr. Hoeft stated that Pheasant Marsh assessments would <br />be similar to the Hunter's Crossing assessments in which the developer was responsible for the <br />largest assessment as the developer benefited the most from those services. <br /> <br />Page 7 of 15 <br />