Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Broussard Vickers to <br />approve the animal control contract submitted by Otter Lake. All in favor. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />5. Minute Taking (TimeSaver) <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Travis to approve the <br />minute taking contract submitted by TimeSaver. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />6. Public Works Staff/Union Agreement <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Nelson seconded by Council Member Travis to table this item <br />for discussion at an executive session following the regular meeting. All in favor. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Hasiak Building Permit <br /> <br />Mr. March explained he had heard from the Hasiak's who had informed him they did not wish to <br />obtain a building permit due to financial constraints at this time of year. <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Mr. Hoeft stated he had spoken to Mr. Palzer concerning the matter and it is unclear as to whether <br />or when the Hasiaks would obtain the building permit. The City does have the legal remedy to <br />begin the process to declare the building a hazardous structure, which would require the Hasiaks to <br />either get the permit and have the wiring inspected or risk having the City tear down the building. <br />Mr. Hoeft recommended setting a timeline for the Hasiaks to obtain the building permit and then <br />commencing a hazardous building action should the Hasiaks not obtain the permit. <br /> <br />Council Member Sweeney suggested a six (6) month time limit be set for the Hasiaks to obtain the <br />permit. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned whether the lean to had been tom down. Mr. <br />March indicated that it had not. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned if Staff believed the structure to be a hazard and <br />Mr. Hoeft stated that staff has been unable to inspect same without a building permit. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers questioned the distance to the nearest house from the <br />structure and if the City had any legal liability in the case of a fire. Mr. Hoeft stated that there had <br />been no problems up to this point and no inspections had been completed. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers stated she could understand not wanting to pay for the permit <br />but did not understand why the "lean to" had not been removed. Council Member Broussard <br />Vickers stated she did not believe there had been any good faith on the part of the Hasiaks. Mr. <br />March stated he had been told the Hasiaks were considering leaving the "lean to" up for a dog <br />shelter. <br /> <br />Council Member Sweeney stated it was his understanding the "lean to" was to be removed. <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber suggested sending a registered letter to the Hasiaks giving them a time period to <br />obtain the building permit and informing them the "lean to" would need to be tom down <br />immediately. <br /> <br />Page 11 of 15 <br />