Laserfiche WebLink
<br />) <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired how far from the back of Mr. <br />McDowell's lot the building would be positioned. Mr. McDowell said he <br />believed it was approximately 70 or 80 feet from the property line. <br /> <br />Mr. March noted the public hearing on the five-year tax abatement is scheduled <br />for October 11,2000. <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber inquired as to how many employees Mr. McDowell planned to <br />add with the expansion. Mr. McDowell stated five (5) or six (6) within the next <br />five (5) years, depending on business. <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber questioned the amount of off site business being combined in <br />the expanded facility. Mr. McDowell stated approximately seventy (70) percent <br />of the business would be combined and the other portion would remain at that site <br />due to rail transportation conveniences. <br /> <br />V. <br /> <br />CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />The following changes were requested by Council: Page 2, fourth paragraph <br />change "Ramsey County" to "Anoka County", Page 22 change "QUAD meeting" <br />to "QUAD Community Press", Page 20, eighth paragraph beginning with "Mr. <br />Palzer indicated" change the paragraph to read: "Mr. Palzer indicated there <br />would be new regulations forthcoming regarding lots of one (1) acre or more and <br />Council wanted to comply with the upcoming regulations." Also in the same <br />paragraph change "Rice Creek" to "MPCA". <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Travis <br />to approve the September 13. 2000. City Council Meeting Minutes with the <br />noted changes. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />VI. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS <br /> <br />The City ofCenterville September 14. through September 27.2000 <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft discussed a pending case before the Minnesota Supreme <br />Court he is arguing and has been preparing for. The case is a DUI case in which <br />the drivers vehicle was forfeited and storage costs were incurred. The person <br />whose vehicle was impounded is attempting to get the City to pay the storage <br />costs of $6,000. City Attorney Hoeft noted that his most recent billings included <br />additional time due to these circumstances. <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />Page 6 of 12 <br />