Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A resolution to set a charge to the residents that would be used to correct swales down <br />the road. <br /> <br />Dave explained to Rockey what was discussed previously regarding as builts. <br /> <br />Rockey stated he doesn't expect to receive a certificate of occupancy (e.O.) until <br />September. He questioned that if the city requires 150% letter of credit, why isn't that <br />good enough. The city is doing two things - requiring a letter of credit and holding back <br />building permits. Dave said it is so much easier to have it graded from the start. <br /> <br />Dave informed Rockey that Outlot C would be a part of the approved grading plan, <br />therefore he would be responsible for the grading per the developers agreement. <br /> <br />Rockey stated that he has sold (has money down) approximately 12 lots already, some of <br />which are current Centerville residents. <br /> <br />Rockey said that is e. o. could be withheld if the property is not within 1/1 0 of a foot from <br />the grading plan. <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />They discussed putting a deadline in the development agreement for the grading of 5-6 <br />months. Escrowing money from the time the ground freezing until thaw and work is <br />complete. Suggested escrow of $2000 a lot. Time limit to have grading completed by <br />November 1 st. <br /> <br />There will be a sidewalk on the west side of Brian Drive. <br /> <br />Dave asked about a temporary turn around on the Lake Area Utilities property. Rockey <br />said they won't allow it. Rockey stated they could put a temporary easements providing <br />turn around space on lots 5 and 28. The city may want to escrow to remove the <br />bituminous for the future development to the south, Dave suggested. <br /> <br />They discussed the dead end of Brian Drive, whether a turn around is necessary or not. <br />Other developments just have it as a dead end with signs. Consensus that it just be a dead <br />end with signage. <br /> <br />Dave stated that easements have to be written separately. A separate document stating <br />that there are trail easements on lots 12 and 13 and lots 23 and 24. <br /> <br />Dave suggested a landscape easement for lots 5-10 and lot 27 & 28 so that the property <br />owner could not remove the berm. Also note in the developer agreement that lots 27 & <br />28 should have driveways fronting on Brian Court. <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />Rockey stated that the construction traffic generated by him would be minimal down Brian <br />Drive because it is already close to the specified grade. Dave added that is true but that <br />the utility contractor is not allowed to use Brian Drive. <br /> <br />CC5-29WK.WPS <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />