Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Centerville <br />2009 Street and Utility Improvements Project <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />February 27, 2008 <br /> <br />changed, the water main may be able to be directionally drilled and services tapped out of one <br />access point in the center of the sac. This style of water main installation may allow the street to <br />forego reconstruction. This could be changed to a Type A 1 improvement. <br /> <br />Peltier Lake Drive (CSAH 14 to Centerville Road) - This area has a narrower right-of-way <br />(50' vs. 60' or 66') and steeper boulevards necessitating the water main to be installed in the <br />roadway. Additionally, we feel strongly about the need for the reconstruction of this roadway with <br />a standard City section including curb and gutter due to its poor condition. We feel that this need <br />for reconstruction is independent of the water main installation. We would not recommend <br />changing the scope of work in this area. <br /> <br />Peltier Lake Drive (Between Peltier Circle) - This area has a 60-foot right-of-way allowing <br />the water main to be installed in the boulevard. However, we feel strongly about the need for the <br />reconstruction of this roadway with a standard City section including curb and gutter due to its <br />poor condition. We feel that this need for reconstruction is independent of the water main <br />installation. We would not recommend changing the scope of work in this area. <br /> <br />Peltier Lake Drive (Centerville Road to Mill Road excluding area between Peltier <br />Circle) and Centerville Road (North of development break) - This area was previously <br />included within the C 1 improvement type. These are small areas that require a full reconstruction <br />with new curb and gutter due to their deteriorating condition. Water main already exists in these <br />areas. For clarification purposes another Type B improvement category could be created for further <br />distinction and more accurate costs. This could be then be classified as a B2 <br />improvement. <br /> <br />Q: Could the scope of our road improvements be reconsidered? Can we meet with the engineer to <br />discuss our street's proposed improvements? <br />A: We stand behind our recommendations with regard to the scope of work needed on streets not <br />affected by water main work. As discussed above, the timing of some of the improvements could <br />be reconsidered. The Council should consider authorizing meetings between engineering staff and <br />residents on a per street basis in order to address outstanding concerns about specific street <br />improvements. <br /> <br />Q: Can the City hire another engineering firm to look at Bonestroo's recommendations? <br />A: The City paid $10,000 to Braun Intertec to take soil borings and produce a signed engineering <br />report complete with recommended street sections. Those recommendations align with <br />Bonestroo's recommendations. <br /> <br />Q: Why are some people allowed to wait until 20 12 to hook to City water while we are being forced <br />to do so by 2010? <br />A: City ordinance identifies two requirements for the City water system. <br />1. All residents must be connected by 2012. <br />2. Residents must connect within one year of water service being made available to them. <br />The City could consider enforcing the 2012 connection year in order to maintain enforcement <br />consistency throughout the City. <br />