My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1995 CC Minutes
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
1995 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2006 8:34:06 AM
Creation date
9/26/2005 2:02:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
452
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />INTROX>>UCTION <br /> <br />Recent growth in Centerville has resulted in a dwindling supply ofland located within the <br />Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The City Council has determined the need to <br />update the Centerville Comprehensive Plan as a prerequisite to expanding the MUSA. <br />The City formally began the process of updating the plan in September, 1995. <br /> <br />One of the first steps in this process is to hold a Priority Setting Session with stakeholders <br />in the community. A Town Meeting was held on October 18, 1995 at the Centerville <br />Elementary School to identify goals and objectives and issues of primary concern, which in <br />turn will be addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. The following is a summary of the <br />input at the priority setting meeting. <br /> <br />PROCESS <br /> <br />Residents, business owners, educators and volunteer organizations were invited to <br />participate in the Town Meeting. Approximately 20 people attended the session, including <br />City officials, business owners and concerned citizens. <br /> <br />The meeting began with an overview of the process and timetable involved in updating the <br />City's Comprehensive Plan. The participants were then asked to individually list three of <br />Centerville's strengths, weaknesses and growth concerns. These responses were displayed <br />on an overhead, then discussed and ranked. The participants were also asked to draw a <br />map of the City and identify the major streets, natural features, buildings of interest, <br />landmarks, parks, etc. The ten highest rated responses in each category, as well as the ten <br />most identified features on the map are listed in Table 1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.