Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />January 8, 2003 <br /> <br />He advised that the doors of each unit are metal roll-up, and the walls between units <br />would be concrete, as would the outside and backside walls. He stated that from the front <br />streetscape they would utilize colored block, with some signage and the office being <br />visible, as well as a pylon sign and flagpole. He indicated security was addressed <br />through the lift gate access, with laser beam security after hours, tied into the police <br />department, and lighting that would go off with attempted after hours entry. He stated <br />the fire department had indicated sprinklers were necessary in the industrial park, and <br />each unit would have one. They have met with the fire Chief and discussed how to tie <br />into the fire department, and will have an access box for them. <br /> <br />He advised that all turns within the development accommodate semi-trailers. He <br />indicated the buildings are non-combustible, since the walls between are metal stud, <br />metal sheet. He stated they have had a preliminary meeting with Rice Creek Watershed <br />District. A pond on-site accommodates the southern one-third, however they will need a <br />storm water holding pond to accommodate the northern two-thirds. They would create a <br />second pond to aid in evaporation. He indicated that as they move through the process <br />with Rice Creek they expect that the pond size will shrink from that shown now. He <br />stated the green space requirements in the industrial park are 10 percent, however they <br />currently show 30 percent. <br /> <br />He mentioned that the larger building has drive through unit capabilities, and noted no <br />units face out, which aids in the containment and security of the development. He stated <br />they have tried to comply with all ordinances on signage, landscaping, etc. and believe <br />they have done that. <br /> <br />Mr. Tom Keller, Mr. Votel's partner, indicated they have talked about this project for 5 <br />years, and have looked at many sites. He indicated they have decided on Community <br />Self-Storage for the business name, as they want to be part of the community. He <br />indicated he used to think self-storage units were rented by lower income individuals, <br />more transient in nature. He has found that isn't the case. As more ordinances prevent <br />storing of motorcycles, snowmobiles, etc. in yards, there is more need for the average <br />homeowner to use this type of facility. He feels having this close by helps clean up <br />neighborhoods. He stressed that security is important to them, and they have worked <br />with the police to determine surveillance camera needs and what needs to be done to keep <br />crime out. He feels the City will be proud of this development. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers stated they are asking for a Special Use Permit, <br />however there is a problem with the section of land in front of the road. Condemnation <br />proceedings were started, then stopped. The land is not currently divided. She thought <br />they could do a Special Use Permit subject to terms, adding that if the Council denies <br />now the petitioners would have to start over with their application. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated granting a Special Use Permit subject to terms is not an <br />option. There is no problem with the plan, however if the Council were to grant a Special <br />Use Permit conditionally, they could not use because there is no access to the property. <br />He understands that the developer does not want to work with the City. He stated the <br /> <br />Page 7 of 20 <br />