Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated the motion did not reflect the discussion and she was not sure <br />what the request was so she removed it from the agenda as she did not feel she could <br />adequately explain it to Council. She further indicated she had sent it back to the <br />Committee for verification as she did not know that Ms. DeVine would be at the Council <br />meeting to interpret the motion. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated Staff could not understand if it was money or land. Ms. <br />DeVine indicated it was not the land or the sidewalks, it was the northwest stub for a <br />trail, whether or not it was between Lot 1 and 2 or Lots 5 and 6 or at all. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers recommended having the motion read back for <br />clarification ifthere is a long motion to avoid this type of issue in the future. <br /> <br />Ms. Stephan indicated she listened to the tape and typed it verbatim but the Committee <br />had a stub where it is not feasible to have a stub. There was confusion among three <br />members DeVine said between Lots 2 and 3, Brian said between Lots 5 and 6 and that is <br />swamp and Lots 2 and 3 is two lots away from the trail. <br /> <br />Ms. Stephan indicated the motion did not explain any of the proposals that Mr. Carlson <br />presented and, when Staff looked at the discussion, the motion did not make sense. <br /> <br />Ms. Stephan indicated Ms. Moore-Sykes had asked whether the Committee wanted to <br />take park dedication fees in lieu of land as that did not make sense when the Committee <br />is accepting 4.5 acres of land. Staff brought up the sidewalk issue as the Committee <br />made a motion to accept no sidewalks but that cannot be done because it is a collector <br />street and collector streets must have sidewalks. <br /> <br />Ms. Stephan indicated she had contacted Ms. DeVine to ask if the Committee wished to <br />reconsider the motion and she said to put it through, so she asked Ms. Moore-Sykes who <br />told her to send it back to the Committee for clarification and that is what she did since <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes is her supervisor. <br /> <br />5. Proposed Police Consolidation <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes reviewed her memo with Council on questions raised after the <br />informational meeting. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra commented that she now understands the comments of Mr. <br />Wilharber concerning miles patrolled. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that grids would be established and officers assigned to those <br />grids and those decisions would be made by the governing body. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated her biggest concern is the discussion about <br />reopening hiring for all of the staff and she would prefer to move all staff to the new <br />department and let the natural process of attrition bring them to the numbers they want as <br /> <br />Page 13 ofl7 <br />