1992 Rec./Disb./Res. & Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Pursuant to due call and notice thereof the City Council of the City of Centerville held their regular meeting on Wednesday, June 24, 1992 at the City Hall. Mayor Buckbee called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. Present: Dario, Pelton, Wilharber. Absent: Buirgstahler. KIINUTES Koition by Pelton, second by Wilharber to table the approval of the June 8, 1992 meeting minutes, motion carried unanimously. ~a3 - 1994 Police Contract Chlief Dave VanBurkleo of the De!partment appeared before the p~oposed 1993-1994 Police Service i Circle Pines/Lexington Police City Council to address the Contract. M~yor Buckbee requested that the contract define the scope of s~rvice to the City of Centerville to be 16 hours per day as it appears that has been the average number of hours per day given to the City of Centerville to date. i Cduncil member Dario inquired as to Centerville entering into a Joint Powers P~nes and Lexington versus contracting. i Ctiief VanBurkleo advised that it is a goal to enter into a Joint pqwers Agreement versus a contract situation in the future. the possibility of Agreement with Circle Kdtion by Pelton, second by Dario to approve the 1993-1994 Police Service Contract with the Circle Pines/Lexington Police Department with the addition of the definition of scope of service to be an average of sixteen (16) hours per day, motion c~rried unanimously. I W~terworks Bar - ReQuest to Decrease the Cost of a Temoorary 3.2 ~er Permit R~ch DeFoe, owner of the Waterworks Bar, was present to discuss r~duced cost in Temporary 3.2 beer permit with the City Council. M~. DeFoe advised that he would like a permanent 3.2 beer permit for the entire baseball season in addition to a decrease in fee. He noted that the his conversations with the Minnesota Liquor Control Division suggested that he could obtain a permanent 3.2 beer permit for the ball field area. Mr. DeFoe advised that if ttie process involved an ordinance amendment he would pay for the cqst of the amendment. He also advised that the current permit system is too expensive and it is too much of a hassle to obtain temporary 3.2 beer permits. He advised that he has not been told .o~ any concerns or problems that had been associated with the icurrent issues of the 3.2 beer permits. Cduncil member Wilharber noted that he prefers the current system of issuing temporary 3.2 beer permits as the City is able to obtain more control.