Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~;:~,~ <br />.....r<lL <br /> <br />Inc., by and on behalf of its wholly-owned subsidiary <br />Group W Cable of the North Central Suburbs, Ihc., re- <br />questing two forms of approval: .: . <br /> <br />a) Consent to a change in control and transfer of <br />ownership in Group W to a gr6up of five Buyers <br />(transaction one); and <br /> <br />b) <br /> <br />Consent to a change in control and tr~nsfer of <br />ownership in Group Wand transfer of the Cable <br />Communications Franchise Ordinance to North <br />Central Cable Communications,L.P. (trans- <br />action two). <br /> <br />''''': <br /> <br />.. <br />2. On February 25, 1986, the Commission sent to Group Wand <br />Nortll Central a Municipal Request for Information Re- <br />garding Request For Approval and Transfer for the pur- <br />,pose of inquiring into the legal, technical, financial, <br />and other qualifications of North Central, as authorized <br />and required by state law and the Franchise. <br /> <br />3. The Commission requestedtne return of the Municipal <br />Request For Information from Group Wand North Central <br />.by March 11, 1986 so that it would have sufficient time <br />to review the information. North Central filed its <br />response to the Municipal Request For Information on <br />March 24, 1986. <br /> <br />4. The Commission received on April 14, 15, and 17 a <br />request from Group W, North Central, and the Buyers, <br />respectively to bifurcate its consideration of the two <br />transactions. Group W, North Central, and the Buyers <br />stated in effect that consent to the first transaction <br />would in no way be construed or viewed as consideration <br />or consent to the second transaction. <br /> <br />5. The Commission gave notice and held a public hearing on <br />April 7, 1986 for the purpose of providing the public <br />with an opportunity to comment on the two transactions. <br /> <br />6. On April 7, 1986 the Commission reviewed and discussed <br />the information it had received from GroupW and North <br />Central. The Commission unanimously passed a resolution <br />recommending to the Member Cities approval of trans- <br />action one. However, the Commission determined it <br />necessary to continue the public hearing with respect to <br />transaction two because of incomplete responses to <br />requests for information from North Central. <br /> <br />7. The proposed transaction two involves Daniels & Associ- <br />ates, Inc., a Delaware Corporation~ Daniels-Hauser Hold- <br />ing Company, a Colorado general partnership; North <br /> <br />- 2 -. <br /> <br />'.\ <br />,.............-= ~ <br /> <br />- ..----v~".~ <br />