Laserfiche WebLink
<br />) <br /> <br /> <br />City of Centerville <br />March 29, 2002 <br />Page Nine <br /> <br />Enterprise Funds <br />Water Fund <br /> <br />The results of the operations and cash position of the Water fund for the past three years are as follows: <br /> <br /> Percent Percent Percent <br /> 2001 of Total 2000 of Total 1999 of Total <br />Charges for services $ 184,481 100.0% $ 146,321 100.0 % $ 119,627 100.0 % <br />Operating expenses 154.722 83.9 85.511 58.4 94.208 78.8 <br />Operating income 29,759 16.1 60,810 41.6 25,419 21.2 <br />Nonoperating income 165.916 89.9 129.134 ~ 223.681 187.0 <br />Net income before transfer $ 195.675 ...1Q6.Q % $ I R9 944 ~% $ 249 100 ~% <br />Cash balance, December 31 $ 1.264755 $ 1 093 145 $ 902 433 <br />Bonds payable $ 267.000 $ 294 000 $ 324 000 <br />The hook-up fees generate revenue for expansion of the system. These fees contributed to the majority of the large <br />cash balance. The rates currently appear adequate and are at a level sufficient to provide for the operation of the <br />system, but the City should evaluate them annually. <br /> <br />Sewer Fund <br /> <br />The results of operations and cash position of the Sewer fund for the past three years are as follows: <br /> <br />Charges for services <br />Operating expenses <br /> <br />$ <br /> <br /> Percent Percent Percent <br />2001 of Total 2000 of Total 1999 of Total <br />202,121 100.0% $ 181,415 100.0 % $ 148,870 100.0% <br />188.248 -2D 214.089 118.0 240.347 161.5 <br />13,873 6.9 (32,674 ) (18.0) (91,477 ) (61.5) <br />187 .036 92.5 215.656 118.9 348.897 234.4 <br />200 909 ~% $ I R2.982 ~% $ 251 420 j 72.9 % <br /> <br />Operating income <br />Nonoperating income <br /> <br />Net income <br /> <br />$ <br /> <br />Cash balance, December 31 <br /> <br />$ I R I R 376 <br />$ 333 000 <br /> <br />$ I 669712 <br /> <br />$ I 473267 <br /> <br />Bonds payable <br /> <br />$ <br /> <br />366.000 <br /> <br />$ <br /> <br />396 000 <br /> <br />The Sewer cash also is very high compared with operating expenses but large hook-up fees have also been a major <br />factor in the increase. The operations before hook-up fees have been at a loss for several years until 2001. <br />It is important that the City review rates to ensure that the revenue is high enough to cover operating expenses. As <br />mentioned in the Water fund analysis, the hook-up fees should be used for the expansion of the system. <br />