Laserfiche WebLink
<br />J <br /> <br /> <br />City of Centerville <br />March 29, 2002 <br />Page Ten <br /> <br />Other Items <br /> <br />Local Tax on Gambling Organizations <br /> <br />The City has an ordinance that requires a local tax on lawful gaming operations. There seems to be some confusion on what <br />the gambling organizations owe and why they owe. The City should have a clear understanding of what they are entitled to <br />and have a system to check the accuracy of what they are provided. This comment was initiated by the fact that the City had <br />several payments received in January 2002 that were not identified on the receipt and when discussed it still was not clear <br />what each payment was for. <br /> <br />Investing Funds <br /> <br />At December 31, 2001, the City had $3,328,039 in a checking account earning .75 percent. The lowest balance was <br />approximately $950,000 in February 2001. The average appeared to be approximately $2,000,000. The City should be <br />monitoring this balance and invest it appropriately. <br /> <br />Filing Information <br /> <br />We mentioned deficiency in capital projects filing earlier in the letter. We also noted that a thorough process of filing <br />invoices is lacking. We observed several occasions where a significant time was spent in looking for an invoice. We <br />recommend that the City consider its current filing system and improve the organization. <br /> <br />Claim Approval <br /> <br />The City's consent agenda indicates the Council is approving disbursements when it is really approving claims. It is <br />important that the consent agenda accurately reflect that the City is preapproving rather than subsequently approving <br />expenditures. Statutes don't allow for subsequent approval unless the appropriate resolution delegating approval authority to <br />staff has been passed and that resolution has not been done. <br /> <br />Invoice Approval Process <br /> <br />According to City staff, several commissions have been allowed to initiate transactions outside the typical approval process. <br />Normally a commission could make recommendations that a Council would approve and then staff would act upon. <br />The current structure takes away from some checks and balances that should exist with administrative approvaL We <br />recommend that any committee or commission only be allowed to recommend action and never initiate transactions. <br /> <br />TIF Revenue Note <br /> <br />The City has a TIP revenue note with Northern Forest Products. The amortization of the note was amended in 2000. The <br />City paid on the note based on an old amortization. This resulted in what appeared to be a $4,000 to 5,000 overpayment. The <br />amount paid was also in excess of the TIP received in total of the December 2000 and June 2001 settlement. The City has no <br />obligation to pay more than what is received. The City has to be aware of the TIP agreements that are in place and the <br />amount of their obligation. The City should also request reimbursement for the overpayment. <br /> <br />Utility Account Set-up <br /> <br />Water accounts are not set up until the occupancy permits are issued. This leaves a gap between when they are installed and <br />when they are set up on the billing. We recommend that when the plumbing permit is issued that the account be set up on the <br />system. The permit form can be modified to include all the pertinent info that would be used by the utility billing clerk. This <br />would include the serial number on both the meter and the remote and the current reading on the meter if it isn't zero. The <br />billing information could be changed when the new resident applies for homestead status or at the time the occupancy permit <br />is issued. <br />