My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-09-08 CC Meeting
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2004
>
2004-09-08 CC Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2009 7:54:45 AM
Creation date
6/19/2009 7:53:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />~ <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that Council Member Broussard Vickers had taken notes <br />and said he would look at his notes as well. <br /> <br />Motion bv Council Member Lee. seconded bv Council Member Paar to aoorove tbe <br />AUI!Ust 11. 2004 City Council MeetinS! Minutes as amended. All in favor. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />IV. CONSENT AGENDA <br /> <br />1. City ofCenterville August 12 through August 25, 2004 Claims <br />2. Centennial Fire District Claims through August 16, 2004 <br />3. Stork Twin City Testing - $1,334.50 (Hunters Crossing 2nd Addition) <br />4. Stork Twin City Testing - $2,589.00 (2004 Street Project) <br />5. Stork Twin City Testing - $177.00 (peltier Preserve) <br /> <br />Motion bv Council Member Lee. seconded bv Council Member Paar to auurove tbe <br />Consent AS!enda as oresented. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. <br /> <br />V. A W ARDSIPRESENTATIONS/APPEARANCES <br /> <br />1. Judy Montain Trio Inn Wedding Receotion <br /> <br />Ms. Montain addressed Council and indicated she had come to City Hall and watched the <br />tape of the meeting where the permit was approved and the word liquor was used and <br />liquor is not the same as 3.2 beer. She then asked Council to reconsider allowing the <br />liquor. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra indicated that, for her, it was a stretch to allow the permit at all <br />because of noise concerns. She then said that she does not feel it is necessary to have <br />hard liquor in the parking lot and keeping it inside may curb the noise slightly. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar indicated he would have no issue with issuing a permit for the hard <br />liquor. <br /> <br />Council Member Lee indicated he is concerned about creating a precedent where the City <br /> <br />would be asked by others for the same type of permit. <br />" <br /> <br />Mr. St. Sauver indicated that they would have had the reception in their backyard but the <br />street is torn up so that is why they moved it to the Trio. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar said he does not think this is a precedent setting situation because <br />Council makes decisions all the time that have the potential to set precedent. He then <br />said that Council has the right to consider each application separately. <br /> <br />Council Member Lee asked whether liquor would be sold in the parking lot. <br /> <br />Page 2 of6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.