2004-04-14 WS & CC Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minnesota Statutes 2003, 244.052 Page 4 of 10 (ii) the offender's history of substance abuse; (4) the availability of community supports to the offender. This factor includes consideration of the following: (i) the availability and likelihood that the offender will be involved in therapeutic treatment; (ii) the availability of residential supports to the offender, such as a stable and supervised living arrangement in an appropriate location; (iii) the offender's familial and social relationships, including the nature and length of these relationships and the level of support that the offender may receive from these persons; and (iv) the offender's lack of education or employment stability; (5) whether the offender has indicated or credible evidence in the record indicates that the offender will reoffend if released into the community; and (6) whether the offender demonstrates a physical condition that minimizes the risk of reoffense, including but not limited to, advanced age or a debilitating illness or physical condition. (hI Upon the request of the law enforcement agency or the offender's corrections agent, the commissioner may reconvene the end-at-confinement review committee for the purpose of reassessing the risk level to which an offender has been assigned under paragraph (e). In a request for a reassessment, the law enforcement agency which was responsible for the charge resulting in confinement or agent shall list the facts and circumstances arising after the initial assignment or facts and circumstances known to law enforcement or the agent but not considered by the committee under paragraph (e) which support the request for a reassessment. The request for reassessment by the law enforcement agency must occur within 30 days of receipt of the report indicating the offender's risk level assignment. The offender's corrections agent, in consultation-with the chief law enforcement officer in the area where the offender resides or intends to reside, may request a review of a risk level at any time if substantial evidence exists that the offender's risk level should be reviewed by an end-of-confinement review commdttee. This evidence includes, but is not limited to, evidence of treatment failures or completions, evidence of exceptional crime-free community adjustment or lack of appropriate adjustment, evidence of substantial community need to know more about the offender or mitigating circumstances that would narrow the proposed scope of notification, or other practical situations articulated and based in evidence of the offender's behavior while under supervision. upon review of the request, the end-of-confinement review committee may reassign an offender to a different risk level. If the offender is reassigned to a higher risk level, the offender has the right to seek review of the committee's determination under subdivision 6. (i) An offender may request the end-of-confinement review http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.uslstats/244/052.html 4/9/2004 ~.