Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minnesota Statutes 2003, 244.052 <br /> <br />Page 5 of 10 <br /> <br />committee to reassess the offender's assigned risk level after <br />three years have elapsed since the committee's initial risk <br />assessment and may renew the request once every two years <br />following subsequent denials. In a request for reassessment, <br />the offender shall list the facts and circumstances which <br />demonstrate that the offender no longer poses the same degree of <br />risk to the community. In order for a request for a risk level <br />reduction to be granted, the offender must demonstrate full <br />compliance with supervised release conditions, completion of <br />required post-release treatment programming, and full compliance <br />with all registration requirements as detailed in section <br />243.166. The offender must also not have been convicted of any <br />felony, gross misdemeanor, or misdemeanor offenses subsequent to <br />the assignment of the original risk level. The committee shall <br />follow the process outlined in paragraphs (a) to (c) in the <br />reassessment. An offender who is incarcerated may not request a <br />reassessment under this paragraph. <br /> <br />(j) Offenders returned to prison as release violators shall <br />not have a right to a subsequent risk reassessment by the <br />end-of-confinement review commdttee unless substantial evidence <br />indicates that the offender's risk to the public has increased. <br /> <br />(k) The commissioner shall establish an end-of-confinement <br />review committee to assign a risk level to offenders who are <br />released from a federal correctional facility in Minnesota or <br />another state and who intend to reside in Minnesota, and to <br />offenders accepted from another state under a reciprocal <br />agreement for parole supervision under the interstate compact <br />authorized by section 243.16. The committee shall make <br />reasonable efforts to conform to the same timelines as applied <br />to ~nnesota cases. Offenders accepted from another state under <br />a reciprocal agreement for probation supervision are not <br />assigned a risk level, but are considered downward dispositional <br />departures. The probation or court services officer and law <br />enforcement officer shall manage such cases in accordance with <br />section 244.10, subdivision 2a. The policies and procedures of <br />the committee for federal offenders and interstate compact cases <br />must be in accordance with all requirements as set forth in this <br />section, unless restrictions caused by the nature of federal or <br />interstate transfers prevents such conformance. <br /> <br />(1) If the committee assigns a predatory offender to risk <br />level III, the committee shall determine whether residency <br />restrictions shall be included in the conditions of the <br />offender's release based on the offender's pattern of offending <br />behavior. <br /> <br />Subd. 4. La" enforc8D8nt agency; cU.sclosure oe <br />information to public. (a) The law enforcement agency in the <br />area where the predatory o!fender resides, expects to reside, is <br />employed, or is regularly found, shall disclose to the public <br />any information regarding the offender contained in the report <br />forwarded to the agency under subdivision 3, paragraph (f), that <br />is relevant and necessary to protect the public and to <br />counteract the offender's dangerousness, consistent with the <br />guidelines in paragraph (b). The extent of the information <br />disclosed and the community to whom disclosure is made must <br />relate to the level of danger posed by the offender, to the <br />offender's pattern of offending behavior, and to the need of <br /> <br />http://www.revisor.1eg.state.mn.us/stats/244/052.html <br /> <br />4/9/2004 <br />