My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-12-04 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2001
>
2001-12-04 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2009 1:49:05 PM
Creation date
7/17/2009 1:48:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the Ordinance went into effect on May 1,2001 and the <br />permit was pulled on May 2, 2001. <br /> <br />Mr. Drilling indicated he had no problem providing a comprehensive sign plan and then <br />asked if a tenant, such as Hair Update, wanted to differ from the comprehensive sign plan <br />would they be required to ask for a variance. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated a variance would not be necessary provided <br />that the sign meets all the requirements of the sign code. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine asked how much square footage of sign age was being used. Mr. <br />Drilling indicated that he was using a small portion of what the sign ordinance allows. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers reminded Mr. Drilling to make sure he does not allow <br />one tenant a disproportionate amount of signage and end up with not enough for the last <br />tenant. <br /> <br />It was determined that Mr. Drilling did not need to submit a comprehensive sign plan due <br />to the fact that the ordinance indicates that the comprehensive sign plan is part of the site <br />review process and Mr. Drilling had completed the site review process prior to the May <br />1,2001 effective date of the Ordinance change. <br /> <br />Mr. Drilling asked if he needed a sign permit. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers recommended that Mr. Drilling check with Mr. Palzer <br />to detcrmine whether or not he needed a sign permit. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine asked City Administrator Moore-Sykes to create a binder with the <br />latest Ordinances because the Commission should have the Ordinance in front of it when <br />discussing possible changes. He then commented that the letter he received from Ms. <br />Bender contained incorrect information and said that anyone at City Hall quoting <br />Ordinances should know what they are talking about. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers suggested that only Mr. Palzer and Ms. Moore-Sykes <br />should be quoting Ordinances. <br /> <br />3. Mr. Brent Coatnev - Mueller Pipeliners (Terminal Transport Building); Site Plan <br /> <br />Mr. Brent Coatney, the President of Terminal Transport indicated that he is downsizing <br />his business due to economic constraints and would like to sublease his facility in <br />Centerville to Mueller Pipe liners. He then indicated that Mueller Pipeliners is a similar <br />type of industry and should be a good business for Centerville. <br /> <br />JeffNordness of25582 East Comfort Drive, Chisago City, representing Mueller <br />Pipeliners presented a grading plan and described for the Commission what Mueller <br />Pipcliners wished to do. He then indicated that the one change in the plan is that Mueller <br /> <br />Page 12 of24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.