Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Council Member Capra noted the Economic Development Committee has requested that <br />Council not approve this until it receives clarification on commercial signage concerning <br />wall signs. <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson stated she objects to home-based businesses with county road <br />frontage being allowed 24 square feet of signage. Her main concern is for allowing a <br />commercial type sign in a residential yard. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers stated she did not believe there were very many <br />locations where this new signage would apply. <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson expressed a concern for the size of the sign and stated she <br />believed the issue was worth the expense and time of re-noticing for a public hearing. <br />She stated she would be more comfortable if a larger sign were allowed just along Main <br />Street but not all county roads. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she believed the size of the sign would be <br />more of a problem along Main Street than along county roads where vehicles travel at a <br />higher rate of speed. <br /> <br />Mr. March stated he believed based on the speed of traffic, the sign would not appear that <br />large. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers inquired as to the cost of publishing for a public <br />hearing. Mr. March indicated the cost was approximately $75. <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson would like to remove the last two (2) sentences and allow home- <br />based businesses a sign of only four (4) square feet. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Nelson. seconded by Council Member Capra to send <br />Ordinance #39 back to the Planninl! and Zoninl! Commission to review the section <br />of the ordinance concerninl! home-based business sil!ns. Specifically reQuestinl! the <br />sentence concerninl! size of sil!n allowed for businesses with county road frontal!e be <br />deleted. the size of the sign remain no larl!er than four (4) square feet. and the sign <br />not be an interior-illuminated sil!n. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra noted she would let the Economic Development Committee <br />know that if there are further questions, a representative should be at the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission meeting to discuss it. <br /> <br />9. Purchase of a 2001 Ford Sterling Plow Truck <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg noted Mr. Palzer has put together criteria for the purchase of a new <br />plow. The current plow is used and the City has budgeted over a three (3) year period for <br />this purchase. <br /> <br />Mr. Palzer presented brochures regarding the proposed plow for review. The quotes were <br />put together through the State Bid Package process. There are two (2) separate quotes, <br />one for the plow truck and one for the body, plow and sander. Mr. Palzer anticipates that <br /> <br />Page 16 of 18 <br />