Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i' <br /> <br /> <br />LMC <br /> <br />LMCIT <br />Risk Management Information <br /> <br />League of Minnllsota Ones <br />Cities promon"9 e%aJlkncg <br /> <br />145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 <br />Phone: (651) 281-1200 . (800) 925-1122 <br />Fax: (651) 281-1298 . TDD (651) 281-1290 <br />www.lmcit.lmnc.org <br /> <br />GOOFY ORDINANCES <br />YOUR CITY SHOULD AMEND OR REPEAL <br />Plus Hints for Writing Better Ordinances <br />By Duke Addicks, LMC Special Counsel <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />As the codification attorney for the League of Minnesota Cities, I have reviewed the ordinances <br />of over 40 cities and have prepared or am in the process of preparing city codes (which codifY all <br />of their ordinances) for these cities. I have seen old ordinances that are out of date and illegal, <br />and recently, enacted ordinances that are unenforceable and may expose the city to liability. <br /> <br />Here are some of the problem ordinances which your city may have and which you may wish to <br />encourage the City Council to repeal or modifY. <br /> <br />There are essentially four kinds of problem ordinances: <br /> <br />I. Archaic ordinances that regulate conduct which the council no longer wishes to regulate or <br />which it is not appropriate for a city to regulate. <br /> <br />2. Ordinances that are unconstitutional because of vagueness. The Constitution requires that <br />an ordinance not be so vague, indefinite, and uncertain as to deny due process of law. An <br />ordinance must be definite enough to give notice of the conduct required to anyone who <br />desires to avoid its penalties. Ordinances must be reasonably certain in their terms and set <br />state objective standards for both the police and for the public to provide adequate notice of <br />what is required. Chicago v. Morales, 1 19 S. Ct. 1849 (1999). <br /> <br />3. Ordinances that attempt to restrict Constitutionally protected conduct and thus violate <br />the Civil Rights laws. 42 U.S.C. ~ 1983 reads as follows: "Every person [includes a <br />municipal corporation] who, under color of any statute, ordinance. regulation, custom, or <br />usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected any citizen of the United <br />States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the de~rivation of any rights. <br />privileges. or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party <br />injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress." (emphasis <br />added) Note: the tort liability limits and other immunities in M. S. Ch. 466 do not apply to <br />federal civil rights actions. Attorneys fees are available to plaintiffs in civil rights lawsuits <br />and are often awarded. <br />