Laserfiche WebLink
<br />13. Political signs. State law, M. S. S 211B.045, provides "All non-commercial signs of any size <br />may be posted from August I in a state general election year until ten days following the <br />state general election." <br /> <br />14. Personnel policies in ordinances. A personnel policy contained in an ordinance is binding <br />on the city until the ordinance is amended or repealed, and can not be modified in individual <br />circumstances by council resolution or motion. <br /> <br />15. Destroying Animals. Unlawful destruction of animals often creates a severe liability <br />problem for cities. There are three statutes relating to the time an animal must be kept before <br />it is destroyed or otherwise disposed of. This is the language the League suggests: "All <br />animals conveyed to the pound shall be kept, with humane treatment and sufficient food and <br />water for their comfort, at least five regular business days, unless the animal is a dangerous <br />animal as defined under M. S. SS 347.50 to 347.54, in which case it shall be kept for seven <br />days, and except if the animal is a cruelly-treated animal under M. S. SS 343.20 to 343.235, <br />in which case it shall be kept for ten days, unless sooner reclaimed by their owners or <br />keepers. The owner shall pay the costs incurred in confining, impounding and disposing of <br />the animal." <br /> <br />16. Barking Dogs. In order to enforce an ordinance prohibiting barking, the ordinance must <br />contain an objective standard to indicate what is unacceptable barking, some type of measure <br />that defmes at what point an animal becomes a noisy nuisance. Five full minutes of <br />continuous barking, whining or howling may be a constitutionally acceptable standard. See <br />City of Edina v. Dreher, 454 N.W. 2d 621 (Minn. App. 1990). The League has a model <br />animal control ordinance. See also "FluffY, Fido & Igor: Animal Control Ordinances" a 1999 <br />League memo. <br /> <br />17. Public Dances. The laws requiring all cities to regulate public dances (formerly M. S. SS <br />624.42 to 624.54) was repealed in 1989, but many cities still have these old ordinances on <br />their books that prohibit same sex dancing and dancing in a "indecent and immoral" manner. <br />Cities are authorized to regulate public dances under M. S. 412.221, Subd. 27, but cities <br />should not restrict first amendment freedoms by their regulations. The League has a model <br />ordinance regulating public dances. <br /> <br />Helpful Hints <br /> <br />1. Do not require city employees by ordinance to do something. Ordinances are not to <br />regulate the conduct of city employees (unless the city wants to prosecute them for <br />violations), but to regulate the conduct of residents, property owners, businesses and others in <br />the community. An employee is liable for failure to perform a ministerial duty in some <br />circumstances. For purposes of determining whether a public official's actions are entitled to <br />official immunity, a ministerial duty is one in which nothing is left to discretion. A clear <br />mandate contained in a city ordinance creates a ministerial duty. See Wiederholt v. City of <br />Minneapolis, 581 N. W. 2d 312 (Minn. 1998). <br /> <br />5 <br />