My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-08-01 P & Z Agenda
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2000
>
2000-08-01 P & Z Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2009 3:51:06 PM
Creation date
7/17/2009 3:48:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br /> <br />~~ COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ <br />,~ .l:~~';';::";'~~," .~ ".= ~'~ ~ __. <br />701 OCEAN STREET SANTA CRUZ. CALIFORNIA 95060 <br /> <br />...... - <br /> <br />':?:~~)'~::::~~,::7:'=1::'~lf:!;. <br /> <br />GOVERNMENTAL CENTER <br /> <br />(406) 425.2\94 <br /> <br />WAL TEFl J. MONASCH AlP <br />PLANNINC DIRECTOR <br /> <br />November 15, 1973 <br /> <br />HENRY R. BAKER <br />DEPUTY PLANNING DIF/ECTOR <br /> <br />Statement from: <br /> <br />Walter J. Hanaseh, AlP <br />Planning Director <br />Santa Cruz County, California <br />Past President <br />American Institute of Planners <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />R. M. Oliphant <br />Neon Products Limited <br />P. O. Box 2063 <br />Vancouver 3 B. C. <br /> <br />Signs of varying types are probably in terms of total cost of <br />production and construction, a relatively minor part of the total <br />development process in most of our communities. They have, how- <br />ever, had two proportionately much larger impacts on these com- <br />munities. <br /> <br />1. Because of the visual impact which they often have, they tend <br />to overwhelm the uses to which these signs are only incidental, <br />and <br /> <br />~. 'I'hey take an ~nord1nately large amount of t1me of all part1c1- <br />pating parties, including the manufacturers, the eventual <br />owners and users and the public agencies which are charged <br />with their review. <br /> <br />This proposed uniform sign code is, I believe, an extremely welcome <br />study by industry representatives which can assist all these parti- <br />cipants in a mOre effective review of specific proposals, and which <br />can lead to a more integrated USe of signs in our urban scene. The <br />effort is particularly useful since it is broadly encompassing and <br />does suggest substantive uniformity but still permits adaptation <br />of the overall proposal to specific and widely differing needs. <br />Many communities will wish to adopt some such code as a separate <br />element whereas many others will integrate the necessary parts <br />of it into their comprehensive zoning and development control or- <br />dinances with a number of the evaluative criteria and the specific <br />fees left to be adopted by more easily amendable resolutions. <br /> <br />Either way, the document does provide a comprehensive checklist of <br />controls for a subject which has been all too often plagued with <br />emotionalism and panic reactions. Even if the attached document <br />does nothing but provide a commOn starting point for discussion, <br />it will serve a most significant purpose. It should therefore <br />receive wide distribution and thoughtful consideration. <br /> <br />WJM:elb <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.