Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />right-of-way approach. 2. a zoning land use <br />approach. 3. an approach by individual type <br />of business establishment. <br /> <br />There is no code in North America that is <br />solely exclusionary in opting for one of these <br />philosophies regulating either on premise or <br />off premise signage. <br /> <br />This Code Is predominantly a combination of <br />a right-at-way code and a zoning approacn. <br />It does not in any place regulate by type of <br />business establishment. For example, service <br />stations are not treated separately from fast <br />food franchisers or Industrial buildings. We <br />believe that the establishment type of approach <br />tends to be discriminafory. For example, an <br />independent fast food merchant with an op- <br />eration similar to that of MacDonalds might <br />need a totally different type of signage from <br />that of MacDonalds because the latter are <br />part of a large marketing network where the <br />signage can be backed up with an intensive <br />program of advertising in other media. The <br />independent merchant on the other hand can- <br />not afford to buy city-wide coverage of other <br />advertising for his single establishment and <br />must rely more heavjly on either on premis6 <br />signage or directional off premise signage. <br />Similarly, an independent neighborhood serv- <br />ice station has vastly different requirements <br />from a freeway orientated outlet of a national <br />chain. It is our opinion, therefore, that in ad- <br />dition to the danger of discrimination, the es- <br />tablishment type approach would in the long <br />run be less than beneficial to a community. <br /> <br />We have used the approach of zoning or <br />tying signs to a particular land use, while <br />basically considering the right-at-way ele- <br />ments, such as speed of traffic, distance and <br />setbacks. <br /> <br />It will be noted that this Code deals with all <br />types of sign age, visible from the public rights- <br />of-way. This is essential, as experience in <br />many communities has proven, any code which <br />controls, licences and provides for inspection <br />of some sections of the sign industry with less <br />control over others, will result in the prolifera- <br />tion of that which is least controlled, very often <br />resulting in a more cluttered and undesirable <br />situation than that which it was attempting to <br />correct. It is an unfortunate fact that a great <br />deal of legislation often limits the large illum- <br />inated product produced by the more profes- <br /> <br />sional or sophisticated companies, with the <br />result that an advertiser utilizes an ever larger <br />number of those sign units which are not <br />properly controlled, even to the inclusion of <br />homemade devices. <br /> <br />Signs are recognized as an essential com- <br />munication medium which is absolutely <br />essential to the travelling public and in par- <br />ticular to newcomers and visitors to any com- <br />munity. They are frequently the only means <br />by which an individual can locate the goods <br />or services that he requires. <br /> <br />We have recognized that not only are there <br />differences in terminology between countries, <br />but even in different areas within the same <br />country. We have noted examples where even <br />reasonably adjacent cities will in one case <br />use a term like "ground sign," another will <br />use "freestanding sign," and yet another will <br />use "detached sign." We have attempted to <br />cover the various alternatives in the defini- <br />tions, to select throughout the work that term <br />that we believe will be most universally under- <br />stood. <br /> <br />There is much that any advertiser can do <br />voluntarily to visually improve his premises, <br />his image and, therefore, his community. <br />Believing that inducement is much more pal- <br />atable than compulsion, we have introduced <br />the innovative use of bon using in this pro- <br />posed Code, where, for instance, an adver- <br />tiser can have a larger copy area on one given <br />type of signage if he foregoes other signs, or <br />whereby an advertiser can be permitted a <br />somewhat greater area or height on a free- <br />standing or ground sign if he will tastefully <br />landscape the area in which it is installed and <br />maintain such landscaping. <br /> <br />We have attempted to compile this work in <br />the best interest of our communities, our cus- <br />tomers and our industry. We sincerely hope <br />that this Code will make a substantial contri- <br />bution to better quality signs and to more <br />uniformity of controls throughout the country. <br /> <br />PERMISSION IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ANY <br />GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY TO COPY OR <br />DUPLICATE THIS DOCUMENT IN WHOLE OR <br />IN PART. OUR PRINTERS HAVE BEEN AU- <br />THORIZED TO USE ANY OF OUR PLATES OR <br />MATERIALS FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANY <br />SUCH AUTHORITY DESIRING TO PUBLISH <br />THEM. <br /> <br />., <br />