Laserfiche WebLink
<br />existing, non-conforming use, once stubs are to a lot and a resident would have to <br />hook up within one year to sanitary sewer. He noted water would not have to be <br />hooked up until the well system fails. <br /> <br />Council Member Travis asked why the developer was not responsible for 53% of <br />the total project cost. Mr. Peterson stated the developer should not have to be <br />responsible for trunk fees along the park or for the $35,000 fee to extend City <br />trunk sewer. <br /> <br />Council Member Travis questioned who would be responsible for future <br />extensions to the water and sewer to the south. Mr. Peterson stated future <br />developers and properties to the south would be responsible for these fees. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers stated Mr. Vanderbeek's property is a <br />concern at this time due to the proportion of value added versus the amount of his <br />assessment. She explained this lot could only be subdivided into two lots and this <br />lot could only sell for roughly $40,000 which would only cover the cost of his <br />assessment to one lot. <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson asked who would be responsible for paying an <br />assessment if a petition was approved by a Judge in court. Mr. Peterson noted the <br />City would be responsible for paying the assessment through the general fund. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson stated he would schedule a meeting with Mr. Vanderbeek to discuss <br />the current assessment and if the fee could be negotiated. <br /> <br />Mr. Vanderbeek asked if the water line could be brought down the entire east side <br />of the roadway. Mr. Peterson stated this could be possible to allow for a better <br />stub location on the Vanderbeke property. <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber asked if both pipelines could be placed on the west side of the <br />roadway. Mr. Peterson stated the west side of the roadway is extremely tight and <br />the directional jackings were more expensive than the directional borings for <br />service stubs. <br /> <br />Motion bv Council Member Sweeney. seconded bv Council Member Nelson <br />to accept the Preliminary Report and Authorize the Plans and Specifications <br />for Hunter's Crossin!!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber indicated that Mr. Vanderbeek presented the Council with a <br />written statement to contest the assessment for his property. <br /> <br />Overweight Permit - WB Miller <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber read through the permit request and stated the overweight <br />permit request was needed for LaMotte Drive. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers asked which roadways would be traveled for <br />this construction. Council Member Sweeney stated this permit would be hauling <br />from Heritage Street and LaMotte Drive to LaMotte Park. He explained the <br /> <br />7 <br />