My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-01-08 P & Z Agenda
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2002
>
2002-01-08 P & Z Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2009 9:38:44 AM
Creation date
7/20/2009 9:37:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br /> <br />l\1r. J\;Iarch indicated he did not think upgrading the shed to provide for the one hour fire <br />protection would work in all situations. He then indicated that the way his house is built <br />there is a nook behind the garage and the main part of the house where the shed is <br />located. He further indicated that, ifhe is required to move the shed, it would be moved <br />to the farthest back comer of his lot and his neighbors would have to look at it. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated that the City has allowed zero clearance in <br />the past as long as the structure complied with the fire code. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that using a conditional use permit rather than changing the <br />Ordinance would allow the City to retain control over the other sheds in town. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber questioned whether, after receiving his letter of noncompliance, <br />Mr. March had taken a look to see if there are other noncomplying sheds in town. <br /> <br />Mr. March indicated he had not driven through the south portion ofthe community but <br />stated there are other noncompliant sheds in his area. <br /> <br />Commissioner McLean questioned whether the shed was nonconforming all along. <br /> <br />Mr. March indicated his shed has been nonconforming since the home was built. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated that the resident is not required to bring the <br />shed into compliance unless it bums down or falls down. <br /> <br />lY1r. March asked the City to look into the matter and notifY him by letter as to whether <br />the shed needs to be moved. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she did not understand where the address <br />list containing properties with nonconforming structures originated and who issued the <br />letters. She then indicated that the structure is nonconforming and, since nothing has <br />changed, it is grandfathered in. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she would look into the marteL <br /> <br />Vi. mSCUSSION ITEMS <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the first Tuesday in January was January 1, 2002. She <br />then asked when the Commission wished to hold its January meeting. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued and the Commission asked Ms. Moore-Sykes to find out ifMr. Palzer <br />is available on January 8, 2002 or if the meeting needs to be held on Januarj 3, 2002 and <br />report back to the Commission. <br /> <br />Page g cf9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.