My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-02-23 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2025
>
2005
>
2005-02-23 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2009 11:22:41 AM
Creation date
7/21/2009 11:21:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />not to do a substantive review of the form 1240. However, related to the <br />examination of the FCC form 1240, which is used to support Comcast's proposed <br />maximum permitted rate for basic 1 cable service, the Commission chose to <br />examine the methodology utilized by Comcast for charging subscribers for <br />franchise fees paid on non-subscriber related income, such as advertising and <br />shopping chanrtel sales. In conjunction with several other area Commissions a <br />consultant was hired to examine the methodology. After a great deal of <br />deliberation and examination the consultant recommended requiring Com cast to <br />include non-subscriber franchise fees as a part of their annual form 1240 filing. <br />The primary justification was that the FCC form 1240 already contained a <br />process for trueing up costs and receipts, and that it would make reviewing these <br />costs easier for the Commission going forward. If the Commission chooses to <br />adopt rate orders that include the recommended change for determining non- <br />subscriber revenues, Comcast is expected to mount a challenge. <br /> <br />The second part of the Commission's rate review responsibility included an <br />examination of the FCC form 1205 that was filed by Comcas!. This form is <br />utilized to justify proposed costs for equipment and installation charges related to <br />the basic service tier. Because Comcast determines these costs based on <br />national averages and not on the actual local costs, determining whether the <br />charges were justified was very difficult. As such, the Commission joined a <br />national examination of Comcast's costs. Comcast felt that some of the <br />Information requested by the consultant was not necessary for determining the <br />costs, so they petitioned the FCC for relief. At this time, the consultants have <br />completed their examination of the figures and submitted a report and <br />recommendation. According to the consultants there is justification for a refund <br />to subscribers. The next step is for the Commission to decide whether to adopt <br />rate orders reflecting this recommendation. <br /> <br />The New Facility <br /> <br />This is the year that it all came together. Three years of planning, changing <br />rules, borrowing money, locating and buying land, hiring an architect and a <br />contractor, and designing the facility were over. The time had arrived for getting <br />dirty and seeing the project to its end. Let the fun begin! <br /> <br />. Choosing the materials <br />You would think this would be fun, but it's actually quite rife with pressure. <br />Thankfully we had a good team effort when it came to choosing building <br />and finishing materials. As anyone can attest who has been through this, <br />the first items you must choose, such as exterior finishes and roofing <br />materials, get a lot of consideration. You're pretty sure each decision is <br />life or death. By the time you get to the light switch plates and window <br />coverings you realize there is going to be a tomorrow. <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.