1997-03-12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning and Zoning February 4, 1997 Hatem Qamhieh 7251 Clearwater Drive, questioned the drainage flow. Mr. Qamhieh second concern was the run off on the east side of the home by the creek. Mr. Qamhieh asked if the drainage could be directed to the west, keeping the drainage away from the creek. Nyberg explained the back yards will have sod which will absorb more run off then the current landscaping. In addition only four homes will contribute to the run off. Nyberg continued RCWD requires certain peak discharged rates to meet certain criteria's which will apply on the run off issue. Tourville asked Mr. Qamhieh if his questions were answered satisfactory? Mr. Qamhieh said no, he would like the four homes to have all the gutters direct all drainage away from the creek. Bill Lalonde of 1687 Westview Street questioned the restrictive convenient time frame of five years and asked if five years was long enough? Mr. Black felt there was no need to have the restrictive covenant have longer terms since no one local would enforce it. Mr. Lalonde addressed his concerns, suggesting three not two car garages, no dog kennels so there wouldn't be dogs yelping. Mr. Lalonde felt no disturbance of the wetlands. Further, the park dedication land should be on lots 1, 2, and 3. The streets should be wider than narrow and have sidewalks. Mr. Lalonde felt lots 1 - 8 leading to the school should have sidewalk access. He felt there should be curbs and gutters all the way. Mr. Lalonde feels there is a real water problem. In addition he feels the watermain should be brought to Peltier Lake Drive because if it crosses the creek it won't do any good for anyone. Mr. Lalonde requested Mr. Nyberg to view the south west lot in the spring since there is a bigger water issue than there currently appears. Mr. Lalonde stated for the record "he is not in favor of further development in the city, and the city should put a moratorium on all building ". Mr. Qamhieh agreed there should be sidewalks for children to get to school. Tourville questioned the sidewalk issue and asked how this would be addressed? Nyberg explained it would be an issue the City Council would address in the developers agreement. Tourville asked what happen to the sidewalk issue from the last meeting? Nyberg explained the city requires sidewalks on 9 ton collector streets, Lakeland Hills will have 7 ton street. • Tourville asked how much traffic should the city expect from the development to the school? Mr. Black explained the school will have a back door provided for children walking to school and when the school expands a path will be provided. The school has seen the plan and are comfortable as it is. Tourville asked if the trail should be an easement? Nyberg explained the city should identify the walk way as an outlot or trailway easement. Mr. Black explained he wouldn't want an easement because of the value of the homes and the salability. Broussard - Vickers suggested since the one lot is being vacated, provide an access to the school there instead of through the northern lot. Nyberg suggested approval contingent 3