Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Buckbee explained the proposed layout meets the minimal lot <br /> size. However, the rezone is not conducive to the comprehensive <br /> plan. <br /> Mr. Palzer suggested the City consider adjusting the ordinances <br /> to allow light industrial and commercial in the same category. <br /> The Commission discussed identifying commercial, industrial and <br /> light industrial districts and its differences. <br /> Mr. Rehbein noted the suggestions and commented updates will be <br /> implemented and he will reproach the Commission at a later date. <br /> Willow Glen Business Park (WGBP) Preliminary Plat <br /> Mr. March reported on the WGBP and new developments. Mr. March <br /> reiterated the October Commission meeting minutes where the WGBP <br /> sketch plan was addressed. Mr. March also distributed a letter <br /> from the City Engineer and another from Anoka County Highway <br /> Department. <br /> Mr. Rehbein pointed out a discrepancy in the right -of -way (ROW) <br /> between Anoka County Highway Department and himself. Mr. Rehbein <br /> felt Anoka County is requesting too much front footage for the <br /> ROW. Mr. March commented the Commission moved to recommend the <br /> developer address access onto County Road 14 (Main Street). Ms. <br /> Brossard- Vickers questioned future access to outlot A. Mr. <br /> Rehbein indicated County Road 21 north is proposed and will <br /> service outlot A. Chair Welk recommended implementing one access <br /> onto County Road 14 and one access onto County Road 21. <br /> Mr. Rehbein stated the west access will be an exclusively right <br /> turn entrance only and another in and out access on Main Street <br /> and another on 20th Avenue. <br /> Action on Lot Split Request <br /> Ms. Brossard - Vickers confirmed the city ordinance and the state <br /> laws restrict lot splits in the floodplain /floodway. Mr. Palzer <br /> read aloud uniform building code 7.0 and 7.1. In summary, a <br /> property cannot be subdivided in the floodplain unless a <br /> buildable site is located on both of the proposed properties. In <br /> addition, the buildable area must be 2' above floodplain <br /> elevation. Mr. Palzer noted a building can be constructed in the <br /> floodplain. However, the building regulations are restrictive <br /> and can be costly. <br /> Ms. Brossard- Vickers confirmed the prospective owner knows the <br /> property.is in the floodplain and cannot be reconstructed if 51% <br /> or more of the building is destroyed. <br /> 7 <br />