My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-10-13 Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
1999
>
1999-10-13 Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2009 10:18:14 AM
Creation date
12/22/2009 10:17:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
building being proposed is 11,800 square feet, and exceeds the minimum lot and building size per <br /> City Ordinance, Although the two to four available spots have not yet been leased, the proposed <br /> building will be able to accommodate businesses on the first and second floor of the building. The <br /> proposed building has four overhead drive in doors with a double loading dock that could be split <br /> into four separate bays. The proposed site also included twelve parking stalls in the front of the <br /> building, along with a row of parking on the side of the building. A question on the state required <br /> handicap stalls was addressed, and noted as a contingency on the site. <br /> Mr. March explained that normally in the past, the Planning and Zoning Commission would <br /> discuss the impact of the building on the City, including the effect on the tax base. Mr. March <br /> indicated that prior to his administration, the City had a checklist incorporating different <br /> requirements that needed to be addressed and met by the developer before acceptance of the plan. <br /> Mr. March indicated a revised checklist is currently being drafted, and named protection for City <br /> Staff as well as the Developer as a major benefit of the checklist procedure. <br /> Council member Vickers added the job of the Planning and Zoning Commission at this point <br /> would be to determine if the building type and style was appropriate for the City, and if the <br /> building meets the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance. The Commission should then <br /> make a motion to City Council with their recommendation based on discussed contingencies. <br /> Motion by Mr. Hanson, seconded by Mr. DeVine to recommend City Council approve the <br /> Eibensteiner building plans contingent on the review and approval of the Citv Attorney, <br /> City Engineer and Chief of Police. alon wg ith providing evidence that drainage and ADA <br /> requirements have been met. All in favor. Motion carried. <br /> CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES <br /> August 7, 1999 Planning and Zoning Minutes <br /> Motion by Mr. DeVine, seconded by Mr. Kilian to approve the August 3. 1999 Planning <br /> and Zoning meeting minutes. All in favor. Motion carried <br /> ADJOURN <br /> Motion by Mr. LaMotte seconded by Mr. Hanson to adjourn the August 3. 1999 Planning <br /> and Zoning meeting at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Respectfully Submitted, <br /> Aimee Fairbrother <br /> Staff Liaison <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.