Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Meeting of June 24, 1999 Page 7 . <br /> The City Engineer stated the request was the vacation of drainage and utility easement for Lot 8, Block 7, <br /> )onnay's Northwood to allow the applicant to build a shed to within five feet of the lot line. He advised that <br /> Minnegasco has contacted the City and has no objection to the vacation. However, Connexus Energy <br /> contacted the City and they do object to the vacation as it would restrict the area available to them to safely <br /> maintain their infrastructure. Media One has contacted the City with no conflicts with the proposed vacation <br /> as long as proper clearance can be maintained between the proposed shed and existing overhead facilities. <br /> A property owner directly behind Lot 8 contacted the City and objected to the vacation as the proposed shed <br /> would be closer to their property, which they felt would blemish the appearance of their lot. The property <br /> owner represents a majority of the affected property owners abutting this easement. The property owner <br /> has been contacted regarding the objections. <br /> A resident, who resides at 8330 Oak Ridge Point, stated the power pole being mentioned was used by the <br /> utility company every time the transformer trips. He stated this vacation was in his back yard and he <br /> believes the small shed was actually a small building since it will be constructed on footings. He stated this <br /> building was very close to his back yard, in fact closer to his house and patio than to the petitioner's patio. <br /> He stated a ten -foot easement exists but the petitioner already set the footings at five feet. He stated he had <br /> alerted the petitioner of the need to contact City Hall to assure the setback but he did not take that advice <br /> and has now run into problems. He stated he was concerned about issues of aesthetics and suggested that <br /> neighbors work together to assure none are impacted. He stated he believes sheds are "tacky" and wished <br /> this one would not be built. However, he understands there were property rights to construct it ten feet from <br /> the property line. <br /> Tom Coughlin, 840 Oak Ridge Trail, stated he did call the City about the specifications to follow and was told <br /> it needed to be five feet off the fence line. He stated he had asked City staff about setbacks and indicated <br /> ie knew nothing about whether there were easements. Mr. Coughlin stated the building was actually about <br /> 5 feet 6 inches from the property line and there was no power pole within the area of the easement vacation. <br /> He stated he was not trying to get the shed location as close to his neighbors but, rather, to best utilize his <br /> back yard without placing it in the middle of the yard or to conflict with the existing gymnasium set. Mr. <br /> Coughlin stated he was going to construct it with a wood floor but found a concrete floor would be less <br /> expensive. He asserted he followed all of the City's rules and requested the easement be vacated. <br /> Chris Coughlin, 840 Oak Ridge Trail, stated they had a day care operation from their home and this was the <br /> only location that would work. She stated Connexus told her they don't want to approve the vacation but <br /> didn't appear to strongly object. She noted it was actually only a four -foot vacation. <br /> Ms. Coughlin stated they have laid rock around the shed foundation and will plant bushes and flowers to <br /> improve the view of the neighbor. <br /> Mr. Coughlin recommended that when residents call for information on a permit, the address be given so <br /> information can be sent to the resident. He restated the error was an accident and he did not intentionally <br /> cause a problem. <br /> The City Engineer stated informational booklets were available to residents. He noted that a number of <br /> works need a permit and the resident was responsible to ascertain whether a permit was required. If the <br /> resident does any work prior to that they were responsible. <br /> Dennis Anderson, Connexus Energy, stated they want to be a good community neighbor but it was <br /> , ecoming more difficult for them to maintain their utilities when property owners fence through the easement <br /> 1r plant trees and gardens. He stated that if anyone else makes a vacation request, he would suggest they <br /> be told not to build within the easement. <br />