Laserfiche WebLink
-2 <br /> Village Engineer had sent his recommendations on cost and <br /> materials for streets and Parent - Schilling were to get <br /> their own figures for comparison. <br /> Bond needed: Cash Escrow deposit or performance bond. <br /> Park land: 10% gross area land prior to subdivision which <br /> would be figured as follows: 25 lots, cost $30,000 brings <br /> it to $120 payable per lot. <br /> Percolation tests are to be taken subject to building <br /> inspector recommendations. <br /> Ken Salin made a motion to submit the Parent - Schilling <br /> plot plan to council for approval as far as P &Z are con- <br /> cerned. Tom Wilharber seconded it, motion carried. <br /> Ken Salin made a motion to adjourn meeting. gordy Rehbein <br /> seconded it, motion carried. <br /> Meeting adjourned at 9:15 pm. <br /> Council had short meeting and were discussing Parent - <br /> Schilling plot plan when Schilling and Parent came back <br /> to meeting and wanted a change in park land fees. They <br /> thought the interpretation of Ordinance 15, Section 6, <br /> paragraph 12 was read in error at meeting and should be <br /> corrected while council was in session. They thought <br /> the park land value read 10% of land value prior to sub - <br /> division and as such the amount per lot should be $50 instead <br /> of $120 as quoted at P &Z meeting. Walt to make further <br /> investigation of this by calling Joe LaCasse to get the <br /> value, of land before Parent and Schilling bought it. <br />